Some zen latency tests:
http://www.planet3dnow.de/cms/30520-ryzen-7-1800x-teil-2/subpage-tiefenanalyse-der-architektur/
Its not illegal being incompetent and get to not true-to-reality conclusion base on data and methodology that is not 100% correct. You don't deal with this by censoring people, you deal with this by creating a healthier ecosystem to and encourage more highly technical content and let the community judge itself which channels are better.
http://www.planet3dnow.de/cms/30520-ryzen-7-1800x-teil-2/subpage-tiefenanalyse-der-architektur/
You're wrong and you're right, but don't feel bad because it's a common mistake on the web. It actually IS up to Google to decide who is or isn't allowed to run videos on THEIR site. Now you're right that this is censorship, but it is very much legal and prudent of Google to do so.
You don't really have the right to free speech on the internet for the most part, you have the right to say whatever the site owners will tolerate. Google is a privately held company who gets to make up their own rules about their services, and people get to choose if they care to use those services based on those rules. I know it sounds dumb and hokey, but you would not BELIEVE how many times I'd have to explain to people that just because they're a member of a website it doesn't give them the right to say whatever they wanted.
Sorry, just a personal peeve of mine. Too many years as a mod/admin at too many sites having to explain that to people. My apologies for the rant, but just pointing it out.
Its not illegal being incompetent and get to not true-to-reality conclusion base on data and methodology that is not 100% correct. You don't deal with this by censoring people, you deal with this by creating a healthier ecosystem to and encourage more highly technical content and let the community judge itself which channels are better.