AMD RDNA3 Specifications Discussion Thread

Wouldn't that frame limit hold the 40x0 series way back from what their power draw would be if they could run uncapped? Just another stupid question...
 
Navi 31 is the new R600.
Hot, broken***, and too little too late. Designed to clock high, but massively undershooting its clock speed targets. Also a very misbalanced architecture -- overkill on memory configuration, yet unable to take take advantage of it.

But priced to awkwardly compensate and fit into Nvidia's pricing scheme.

***Remember that R600 had broken MSAA resolve in its ROPs, causing performance to tank whenever AA was enabled in games.
 
You'd need some other evidence that the cards people have bought are A0

Fj9fsL_WQAA6M5-


Well it's not *that* hard to find it out, really.
That's the VBIOS that comes with any 7900 anything you buy now (i.e. made by AMD boards).
 
In the footnotes didn't they specify it was 7900 XTX vs 6900 XT with both cards at 300W? 7900 XTX isn't 54% faster at 355W, let alone when limited to 300W
I’m sure a game exists where it is true. Did the footnotes specify a title?
 
We’re they planning on decoupling the clockspeeds from the start? The first thing I thought when I read about that was “something’s wrong”.
 
Back
Top