Henry swagger
Newcomer
So amd lied about performance per watt
zoinks144FPS limit
Navi 31 is the new R600.
Ah jeez, so funny.
?and too little too late
R520 vibes really.Navi 31 is the new R600
It's fine.Also a very misbalanced architecture -- overkill on memory configuration, yet unable to take take advantage of it.
You'd need some other evidence that the cards people have bought are A0
roflGuess Sony and MS could look at alternatives
Why? Console SOCs are entirely different. By the time either look to make next-gen consoles AMD will have 4.5 to 5.5 more years of designs.Guess Sony and MS could look at alternatives for their next machines.
And no one else has quite this combo of good IP; not even talking about backcompat points.Console SOCs are entirely different
Why? Console SOCs are entirely different. By the time either look to make next-gen consoles AMD will have 4.5 to 5.5 more years of designs.
Wouldn't that frame limit hold the 40x0 series way back from what their power draw would be if they could run uncapped? Just another stupid question...
There is probably some point on the power curve where it applies.The uncapped results aren’t much different. Wonder why AND thought it was ok to claim a 50% perf/watt improvement.
In the footnotes didn't they specify it was 7900 XTX vs 6900 XT with both cards at 300W? 7900 XTX isn't 54% faster at 355W, let alone when limited to 300WThere is probably some point on the power curve where it applies.
I’m sure a game exists where it is true. Did the footnotes specify a title?In the footnotes didn't they specify it was 7900 XTX vs 6900 XT with both cards at 300W? 7900 XTX isn't 54% faster at 355W, let alone when limited to 300W