I think that he's probably referring to Infinity Cache given that everyone was expecting at least 256MB
Probably a hint towards frequencies vs unit count.
They'll still be at around 30% clock disadvantage if things go as rumoured.nVidia has both: 50% higher clock rates and 67% more compute units...
Why doesn't Igor count additional 75 watts from the PCIe slot?However, this also limits the maximum board power of the card to 450 watts, whereby the actual TBP should be far below that.
Those high-end cards don't actually draw much if anything from the PCIe slot, it's around 10W.Why doesn't Igor count additional 75 watts from the PCIe slot?
No, it's not. For example, RTX 3090 with two 8-pins draws 50~60 watts from the slot.Those high-end cards don't actually draw much if anything from the PCIe slot, it's around 10W.
Yes. So there's no reason to not count slot power for estimating the possible max TGP/TBP.Slot power tends to be last in load distribution.
Except for the fact that he has the actual schematics and it's immediately visible if the slot is load bearing or not, I suspect he didn't make a mistake.Yes. So there's no reason to not count slot power for estimating the possible max TGP/TBP.
Probably a hint towards frequencies vs unit count.
In light of about 3x the FLOPS, it's bizarre.Right. Rendering a frame is an intricate dance where the the bottleneck shifts every few milliseconds. Even if dual-issue isn’t possible that on its own wouldn’t explain the lack of scaling in games.
I'm expecting good stuff on those points from NVidia.Most passes are bandwidth or occupancy limited anyway.
+- sorta there.How much is it credible?
Fast but not quite fast enough.That would also mean 90+TF.