AMD: R8xx Speculation

How soon will Nvidia respond with GT300 to upcoming ATI-RV870 lineup GPUs

  • Within 1 or 2 weeks

    Votes: 1 0.6%
  • Within a month

    Votes: 5 3.2%
  • Within couple months

    Votes: 28 18.1%
  • Very late this year

    Votes: 52 33.5%
  • Not until next year

    Votes: 69 44.5%

  • Total voters
    155
  • Poll closed .
DX11 runtime is not available on Windows update yet. Additionally the demos have, so far, been validated on 5800 and Windows 7; likewise you can run them on a 5700 but we're going back and validating them at the moment.
It's now available and recommended for all on Windows Update. FWIW the demos do run perfectly fine on Vista, and I agree that a DX11 check would have been a better solution given no other Windows 7 features are used. Hopefully the installers will be updated soon.
 
Is that gpuz shot of the 5950? Even if they couldn't go higher than 725mhz core within the allowed 300w, I would expect them to give the '70 some fast memory, as that's only a few watts anyway.
 
I think but am not 100% sure that there are two variants for the 5900 series.

Check the AMD DeviceID Page.

http://developer.amd.com/drivers/pc_vendor_id/Pages/default.aspx

ATI Radeon HD 5450 EG CEDAR PRO 68F9
ATI Radeon HD 5700 Series EG JUNIPER XT 68B8
ATI Radeon HD 5700 Series EG JUNIPER LE 68BE
ATI Radeon HD 5800 Series EG CYPRESS XT 6898
ATI Radeon HD 5800 Series EG CYPRESS PRO 6899
ATI Radeon HD 5900 Series EG HEMLOCK XT 689C

What's an XT without a Pro?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
And you saw greater than 300 watt power draw from 4870x2 in what real world application? None?
I was referring to these results, http://ht4u.net/reviews/2009/msi_r5850_ati_radeon_hd5850/index9.php. Sure you may say Furmark isn't real world, but it is very much possible to exceed TDP over a long period of time. That's just sloppy design. Granted AMD says it is possible to throttle now, so maybe it won't be an issue. And what we saw so far from HD5xxx is quite promising thus far, the cards no longer seem to exceed TDP. So if the 5970 is indeed downclocked 5870X2, I think it's quite possible that it won't really draw more than 300W (hence actually less than 4870X2), 2 5850 already wouldn't, do a little binning (minimally lower chip voltage) and it won't even with full simds.
 
And you saw greater than 300 watt power draw from 4870x2 in what real world application? None?

Regards,
SB
In what way could anyone see that kind of power draw in non-real-world applications? I.E. what makes any application non-real-world?
 
In what way could anyone see that kind of power draw in non-real-world applications? I.E. what makes any application non-real-world?

Since no-one runs benchmarks with Furmark (framerate) it's ridiculous to only show power draw and leave FPS behind. FurMark then becomes an (un)realistic display of power consumption with no reference.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
ATI Radeon HD 5450 EG CEDAR PRO 68F9
ATI Radeon HD 5700 Series EG JUNIPER XT 68B8
ATI Radeon HD 5700 Series EG JUNIPER LE 68BE
ATI Radeon HD 5800 Series EG CYPRESS XT 6898
ATI Radeon HD 5800 Series EG CYPRESS PRO 6899
ATI Radeon HD 5900 Series EG HEMLOCK XT 689C

Where is Redwood?
 
You'll learn to ignore the monitor borders... but the side effect is that you'll hit lampposts on the street because you'll ignore those too.

:)
 
I've been running a 3 monitor Eyefinity setup for nearly to 3 weeks now, and the bezel are not an issue. Your brain just adjust to it. Even my miss-matched monitor size setup (25.5" + 27" + 25.5") isn't an issue.

Btw, Eyefinity is gaming bliss. The added peripheral vision adds so much immersion to gaming. I'm surprised there's so little talk about it here with this supposed hardcore 3D audience.
 
Back
Top