Moar pic's of the Cypress board
Soon naked with better quality.
Drivers are still unavailable for this one tester.
Soon naked with better quality.
Drivers are still unavailable for this one tester.
More limiting factors than, say, for the use of DX11 tesselation?I have to ask you, How does PhyX have more marketability when there's a lot of limiting factors the consumers have to face in order for them to use it?
More limiting factors than, say, for the use of DX11 tesselation?
It is definitely not a dual core, and the packaging suggests that it is not a MCM either.
But it doesn't provide as much quality improvements also?The biggest benefit of Tessellation would be that it doesn't cut your frame-rate in half when you enable it?
And here are the hi-res shots - click!Moar pic's of the Cypress board
Soon naked with better quality.
Drivers are still unavailable for this one tester.
And here are the hi-res shots - click!
The FTP server with the test drivers is still unaccessible for download.
There are two unused power phase pads on the board -- probably the "SIX" board with 2GB have them?!
Some (AMD made) benchmarks:
http://www.czechgamer.com/novinky/5055/ATI-Radeon-HD-5XX0-prvni-benchmarky-jsou-venku.html
Uhm, and how do you explain the double Rasterizer and Hierarchical Z?
Uhm, and how do you explain the double Rasterizer and Hierarchical Z?
Btw where's the "fixed-function" tessellator?
Since when does having more than one of a given unit on a die classify something as multi-core? We've had multiple ROPs and TMUs for ages. Now the front-end is getting some parallel love.
Btw where's the "fixed-function" tessellator?
I thought there as a tessellator unit siting in the center in the chip hell image, just above the dispatch processor.
-25% is for NV-preferable application (i.e. CoH).I could bet that this -25% of the 5850 vs the GTX 285 is Dead Space and that 120% is Crysis!
I thought there as a tessellator unit siting in the center in the chip hell image, just above the dispatch processor.