AMD: R7xx Speculation

Discussion in 'Architecture and Products' started by Unknown Soldier, May 18, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. nicolasb

    Regular

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2006
    Messages:
    421
    Likes Received:
    4
    FUDzilla:
    link
     
  2. nexus_alpha

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2006
    Messages:
    44
    Likes Received:
    0
    That puts it at what gtx speeds.
     
  3. nicolasb

    Regular

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2006
    Messages:
    421
    Likes Received:
    4
    Yes, but the high-end solution will have at least two chips on one card.
     
  4. Silent_Buddha

    Legend

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2007
    Messages:
    19,426
    Likes Received:
    10,320
    True, after all R600 boards were rated for >225 watts but generally only used about 160-185 watts.

    I'd imagine the G100/GT200 at that design goal to be just slighly more than that. Maybe in the 190-225 watts range. Er, or is the design goal with regards to the chip only? :p Naw, couldn't be, that would be insane.

    Regards,
    SB
     
  5. Shtal

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2005
    Messages:
    1,344
    Likes Received:
    4
    I would assume on 55nm tech - clock frequency could be push higher as appose on 90nm.

    My guess it should be slightly faster then GF8800Ultra.
     
  6. Rys

    Rys Graphics @ AMD
    Moderator Veteran Alpha

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2003
    Messages:
    4,182
    Likes Received:
    1,579
    Location:
    Beyond3D HQ
    That wasn't something they actually knew would happen, if memory serves. Based on the data they had before the chip came back, and the clock targets they initially wanted to hit (which weren't quite met), I think the upper limit was something they expected as the norm, not the worst case.

    If RV770 isn't something different now compared to what it was (and maybe still is :razz: ), I'm pretty confident that the top single chip RV770 configuration should be faster than any single chip G80 configuration we've ever seen.
     
  7. Ailuros

    Ailuros Epsilon plus three
    Legend Subscriber

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Messages:
    9,511
    Likes Received:
    224
    Location:
    Chania
    I'd say that both IHVs would be in deep s**t, if they couldn't manage to release after almost 2 years a (single chip) performance GPU that's faster than a G80 heh ;)
     
  8. ShaidarHaran

    ShaidarHaran hardware monkey
    Veteran

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2007
    Messages:
    4,027
    Likes Received:
    90
    It's also not even close to "2 years post-G80" unless RV770 is pushed back to November.
     
  9. BRiT

    BRiT (>• •)>⌐■-■ (⌐■-■)
    Moderator Legend Alpha

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Messages:
    20,516
    Likes Received:
    24,424
    But close enough to "almost 2 years"...
     
  10. ShaidarHaran

    ShaidarHaran hardware monkey
    Veteran

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2007
    Messages:
    4,027
    Likes Received:
    90
    It's February 2008 right now. G80 launched in November 2006. Current rumor for RV770 is launch around Computex in June. June is pretty far away from November, last time I checked.
     
  11. BRiT

    BRiT (>• •)>⌐■-■ (⌐■-■)
    Moderator Legend Alpha

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Messages:
    20,516
    Likes Received:
    24,424
    You said it wasn't even close, at its planned release date it would be at 19 months. That is much closer to 2 years than 1 year if you have to do any rounding. Do you think they will have another product released at exactly 2 years in November or will it still be the RV770? Not to mention if Nvidia's next-gen will be released later than that, AMD's RV770, it certainly pushes them into the damn close to 2 year window. ;)
     
  12. ShaidarHaran

    ShaidarHaran hardware monkey
    Veteran

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2007
    Messages:
    4,027
    Likes Received:
    90
    As far as I'm concerned 5 months prior to 2 years isn't close enough to 2 years to say "close to 2 years". Not in this industry. Close to 2 years is more like a month or less.
     
  13. compres

    Regular

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2003
    Messages:
    553
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    Germany
    LOL@the 2 year not 2 year discussion. Quite pointless.

    On topic:

    I hope they have a big single chip high end this time around, or that the Rv770 multichip behaves like a single chip. XFire/SLI is just a pain in the...
     
  14. BRiT

    BRiT (>• •)>⌐■-■ (⌐■-■)
    Moderator Legend Alpha

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Messages:
    20,516
    Likes Received:
    24,424
    As I asked before, will Nvidia have their next-gen out before or within that timeframe? I thought they were likely to release three months after the planned RV770 release. I consider plus or minus ten percent (+/- 10%) to be close enough (2.5 months).
     
  15. ShaidarHaran

    ShaidarHaran hardware monkey
    Veteran

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2007
    Messages:
    4,027
    Likes Received:
    90
    I took Ailuros' comments to mean it would be sad if neither vendor could produce a faster chip than G80 in the given timespan, not that both had to. As for NV's ability to do so, hasn't history taught us this lesson many times over already? NV always has something up their sleeve.
     
  16. Kaotik

    Kaotik Drunk Member
    Legend

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2003
    Messages:
    10,245
    Likes Received:
    4,465
    Location:
    Finland
    Yeah, just like they had when they released FX-series... oh wait, no, they didn't, they made bad decisions on that generation, which is pretty much inevitable, it happens to everyone now and then in the industry, there's no 100% safe route on the top
     
  17. ShaidarHaran

    ShaidarHaran hardware monkey
    Veteran

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2007
    Messages:
    4,027
    Likes Received:
    90
    Oh my, how wonderfully irrelevant given the 6 YEARS SINCE THEN OF SUCCESSIVE, SUCCESSFUL RELEASES.
     
  18. Kaotik

    Kaotik Drunk Member
    Legend

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2003
    Messages:
    10,245
    Likes Received:
    4,465
    Location:
    Finland
    You talked about history yourself, and you don't count FX-release as part of it? :roll:
    It's not like nVidia would have been solely keeping "the throne" since that fiasco, or that they'd have had always something ready when ATI releases something new.
     
  19. ShaidarHaran

    ShaidarHaran hardware monkey
    Veteran

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2007
    Messages:
    4,027
    Likes Received:
    90
    How many times since the FX release has NV repeated the past? How many times prior to the FX release had they done the same?

    They put 3dfx out of business with their fast release schedule, and they've stayed ahead of ATI since the FX days, always launching first, and always countering whenever ATI managed to get a faster part out.
     
  20. oeLangOetan

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2003
    Messages:
    76
    Likes Received:
    0
    most of those "faster products" were never really available or had a tendency to fail quickly
    but you could say that nvidia is a master at keeping up appearances
     
Loading...
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

  • About Us

    Beyond3D has been around for over a decade and prides itself on being the best place on the web for in-depth, technically-driven discussion and analysis of 3D graphics hardware. If you love pixels and transistors, you've come to the right place!

    Beyond3D is proudly published by GPU Tools Ltd.
Loading...