3dmark03 @ QuadroFX

[galperi1]

did anyone notice that a QuadroFX 1000 score is posted on the ORB???

those results are anything but dissapointing

1868 @300/300 speed
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=2938

 

[Dave H]

Not so surprising, considering [H]OCP got 3500 on the 500/500 Ultra (using Barton 3000+) with the old drivers. Assuming linear scaling, a 300/300 NV30 would then be expected to score 2100, so this score is not very far out of line at all, considering the Quadro drivers will be less optimized for game-like workloads.

Presumably the tremendous PS 1.4 improvements in the new GFfx drivers will make their way over to the Quadro soon enough.

 

[DOOM III]

that's incredible low considering it's a NV30 card

 

[Tagrineth]

Hmm... pixel fill rate 831.3, texel fill rate 2028.4? Crikey.

And... my 9500 Pro on my lowly P3 800 + single-channel DRDRAM scored 3013

They might have forced a fallback from PS1.4 to 1.1 like GF3 and 4 would do in the Advanced Pixel Shaders test in 3DMark2001...