I thought Dead Space had great gameplaygameplay mechanics are almost non-existent , too similar to Dead Space.
I did not wish to imply Dead Space did not have good/great gameplay.I thought Dead Space had great gameplay
Forgot about that game. Looked amazing, but not a lot of reviews on Steam suggesting not a lot of sales. Isn't it a point-and-click adventure? If so, an iOS port is necessary.Kind of gave up on Harold Halibut,
It's a strange game, the stop-go claymation makes it look pretty unique and it has some depth to it but it's just lacking something that made me want to jump back in. I think it would make an excellent mobile platform game, though I have not yet tried it on any of my toys.Forgot about that game. Looked amazing, but not a lot of reviews on Steam suggesting not a lot of sales. Isn't it a point-and-click adventure? If so, an iOS port is necessary.
Definitely envious of you, especially if you haven't played RDR2 yet, either. The first RDR is a special game, and I hope that we never get a RDR3 simply because Rockstar can clearly do amazing things if they take their blank check resources and open world design and attention to detail and apply it to some new IP. I'm sure a theoretical RDR3 could be a great game, but I'd just so much rather see what they could do with a new setting. That's part of what made RDR so great to begin with. As you say, it's super novel and I want that feeling again. RDR3 wont do it.Playing Red Dead Redemption for the first time and am really enjoying it. You only get to play a game for the first time once and this has that novel feel to it. I was up until 3:30a without even knowing it and I had things to do this morning that I was almost late for. Gotta go mow the lawn and cook before I can play again and I'm already impatient for it.
Definitely envious of you, especially if you haven't played RDR2 yet, either. The first RDR is a special game, and I hope that we never get a RDR3 simply because Rockstar can clearly do amazing things if they take their blank check resources and open world design and attention to detail and apply it to some new IP. I'm sure a theoretical RDR3 could be a great game, but I'd just so much rather see what they could do with a new setting. That's part of what made RDR so great to begin with. As you say, it's super novel and I want that feeling again. RDR3 wont do it.
All plausible, I'm just saying I dont want to see it. lol I can never get too invested in Rockstar's story and characters too much. It's all very cartoonish in a way that prevents me from taking it too seriously.You do know we already know the time frame and main playable characters for RDR3, right?
RDR = 1911 with Epilogue taking place in 1914. Follows John Marston, then his son Jack Marston. You start as John and hunt down the old gang members that betrayed him, and then hunt down the Pinkertons as Jack.
RDR2 = 1899 with Epilogue taking place about 1906. Follows Arthur Morgan then John Marston. You start as Arthur and play through the fall of the Van der Linde gang. You then hunt down the rat Micah who caused it all in the Epilogue
RDR3 will be 1877 with the Epilogue taking place about 1885. Following the hints from RDR2, you will start the game as Lyle Morgan, Arthur's father, and play through the end of his gang and his death, and then the Epilogue will be Arthur joining Dutch and meeting John and end with the creation of the Van der Linde gang and Dutch making promises about his great visions for their future, and how they're going to run away from the horrible civilization that they came from.