According to this article it does.
http://www.pureoverclock.com/2016/07/wheres-the-hdr-monitors-already/
http://www.pureoverclock.com/2016/07/wheres-the-hdr-monitors-already/
Personally I've never seen a 1080p HDR image on a HDR capable display, just the 4k HDR image on a 4k HDR TV so I'm not entirely sure. But from the sound of it it appears despite having much lower pixel density, the 1080p HDR image offers much better pixel quality than the 4k one. I think we might get some clues once PS4 gets that HDR update and we can compare a 1080p HDR game to a 4k non HDR PC game. But apparently the author have seen something similar at CES and it's vastly better than the 4k non HDR image.AMD stated at CES, earlier this year, that we need better pixels. While the human eye may not work well compared to the magnifying focus of an eagle eye, what it can see as far as the range of colors is concerned is pretty amazing. If pixels aren’t reproducing colors to the extent that the human eye can see them, shades blur together making images look flat, rather than vibrant and varied. This is where High Dynamic Range (HDR) comes into play. HDR can almost reproduce all the colors the human eye can see on an individual pixel basis. This means that a 1080p monitor can actually look better than a 4K that isn’t using HDR.
How very interesting, could it mean playing PS4 Pro games with HDR on at a reconstructed 4k frame actually be more impressive "visually" than on a native 4k PC with non HDR capable monitor? What do you guys think?I still can’t seem to find monitors that support this yet and it’s driving me nuts! The reason I’m so excited about this is during my trip to CES, I actually got to see this in person. What I saw visually blew me away! I would trade 4K in any day for HDR at 1080p. Shoot! Even VR didn’t feel quite as good as an HDR monitor.