What do you think of this?
680 seems to have more CUDA cores as Mediawhateverespresso uses CUDA, right?
It's definitely fast.
Sandra gpgpu bench against tahiti AND pitcain:
http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer...hed-amds-mid-range-radeon-hd-7870-gpu-compute
Wonder if the clock is really 700 or 1000 here..
8SP 8C 705MHz ???
Apparently, this test is compute throughput limited. The scaling to the GF110 follows the FLOPs doubling.
What do you think of this?
Yes, MediaEspresso 6.5 uses CUDA for Nvidia and APP for AMD cards.
Might that be due to an encode engine...?
Does the one in Tahiti work with Media Espresso 6.5 yet?
Neither do I.
Nvidia has always followed method similar to intels tick tock. (nv20 new architecture, nv25 speed upgrade.)
Fermi was new architecture, so Kepler is the upgrade part and Maxwell will be something else.
Jawed
Legend
I bet the scheduling nonsense of old has been deleted.
This is a non-argument. Same applies to AMD's stuff.
Yep, just like NV40 to G70 and G80 to GT200.
Man from Atlantis
Veteran
So all we had to do to calculate the performance of the GTX 680 was take the numbers from a GTX 580 and multiply by three? Well, don't we look foolish now. We could have saved ourselves over 3200 posts of discussion if we had only known.
Err... multiply by 3? Having 3x ALUs doesn't increase performance by 3x, especially when the Fermi ALUs are hotclocked and these aren't, not to mention other possible differences
Of course it does, ask RenderStream experts.
Man from Atlantis
Veteran
norwegian etailer posts their kepler's 3dmark11 score.. P9398 graphics score
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?...56145582074.250887.69170057074&type=1&theater
Last edited by a moderator:
That is a 6990 and the other a 680 (I suppose)
What we should get there? That a single-vga is shorter than a dual?
boxleitnerb
Regular
Thats about 7970@1100 territory. Very nice.
