NVIDIA Kepler speculation thread

Discussion in 'Architecture and Products' started by Kaotik, Sep 21, 2010.

Tags:
  1. Xenus

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2004
    Messages:
    1,316
    Likes Received:
    6
    Location:
    Ohio
    I just want to see the guts behind TXAA already. Is it a post process is it a new form of AA is it an MSAA + post process... And I want to play with it it... *Wishes he could be a reviewer right now*
     
  2. cal_guy

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    217
    Likes Received:
    3
    That has been true for only the top tier Geforces. Currently GF104/106/108 Geforce cards have the full DP rate available to them(1/12).
     
  3. DarthShader

    Regular

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2010
    Messages:
    350
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Land of Mu
    Why? To match the perf/price ratio of Kepler in 1080p and being better everywhere else?
     
  4. AnarchX

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2007
    Messages:
    1,559
    Likes Received:
    34
    GK104 looks throttled with its 1/16. Maybe 1/4 in HW?
     
  5. CarstenS

    Legend Subscriber

    Joined:
    May 31, 2002
    Messages:
    5,800
    Likes Received:
    3,920
    Location:
    Germany
    At least 6 figures are wrong, possibly more. This template seems more like a copycat bait...
     
  6. iMacmatician

    Regular

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2010
    Messages:
    797
    Likes Received:
    223
    Some things I noticed:

    He says "the fastest, most efficient GPU we've ever built," so that means GTX 680 > GTX 590 in performance?
    The Boost appears to be dynamic—goes from default speed to ≈1.10 GHz according to the graph in the video. Average boost speed appears to be around the reported 1.059 GHz though.
     
  7. CarstenS

    Legend Subscriber

    Joined:
    May 31, 2002
    Messages:
    5,800
    Likes Received:
    3,920
    Location:
    Germany
    I know it's been used to suite the currently speaking faction, but in my books, GTX 590 is not a GPU, it's a SKU (well, two at least) or a product.
     
  8. Man from Atlantis

    Regular

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2010
    Messages:
    960
    Likes Received:
    853
    I was told it's based on old and new frames and generates lags, not best for FPS players.. dont have more info than this..
     
  9. Domell

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2004
    Messages:
    247
    Likes Received:
    0
    Do you know something about GK110?
     
  10. Jawed

    Legend

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2004
    Messages:
    11,708
    Likes Received:
    2,132
    Location:
    London
    What has HD4890 got to do with anything? And how the hell is 850MHz "in that range" when G80's hot clock is 1350MHz.

    HD2900XT ran at 725MHz.

    Before G80 NVidia was at parity.
     
  11. Kaotik

    Kaotik Drunk Member
    Legend

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2003
    Messages:
    10,244
    Likes Received:
    4,465
    Location:
    Finland
    The graph should be wrong, according to specs it's supposed to be ~50MHz increase.

    GTX590 isn't GPU, it's 2 GPU's.
     
  12. Man from Atlantis

    Regular

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2010
    Messages:
    960
    Likes Received:
    853
  13. CarstenS

    Legend Subscriber

    Joined:
    May 31, 2002
    Messages:
    5,800
    Likes Received:
    3,920
    Location:
    Germany
    Nothing DOUBLE CONFIRMED at least. :)
     
  14. Alexko

    Veteran Subscriber

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2009
    Messages:
    4,541
    Likes Received:
    964
    GF100 and GF104 had different SMs…
     
  15. fellix

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2004
    Messages:
    3,552
    Likes Received:
    514
    Location:
    Varna, Bulgaria
    Yep, I forgot the "little" Fermi. ;)
     
  16. Man from Atlantis

    Regular

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2010
    Messages:
    960
    Likes Received:
    853
  17. Rangers

    Legend

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2006
    Messages:
    12,791
    Likes Received:
    1,596
    It took them that long to reverse engineer and then copy AMD's superior engineered parts? From the looks of things... :razz:

    Cant wait for reviews! I should still be up for them...hopefully a(nother) leak soon as well.

    If it's $499 will definitely cause some price movement. And at least this time Nvidia wont be caught short on RAM at the high end like they have been for ages.
     
  18. Albuquerque

    Albuquerque Red-headed step child
    Veteran

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2004
    Messages:
    4,309
    Likes Received:
    1,105
    Location:
    35.1415,-90.056
    I don't expect them to price the GTX680 at $499, but I'll be pleasantly surprised if it happens. I expect it to show up at $549 instead...
     
  19. dnavas

    Regular

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2004
    Messages:
    375
    Likes Received:
    7
  20. Albuquerque

    Albuquerque Red-headed step child
    Veteran

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2004
    Messages:
    4,309
    Likes Received:
    1,105
    Location:
    35.1415,-90.056
    Cool, hadn't seen that yet, but that's exactly what I would expect. I also expect the prices to shift around a bit in the next 30 to 45 days, but if anything, I only expect AMD to reduce prices and not NVIDIA.

    Let's be blunt: NV can price it mostly wherever the want, and nobody will bitch. It's obvious what happens when AMD tries to do anything like that, even without any competition ;)
     
Loading...

Share This Page

  • About Us

    Beyond3D has been around for over a decade and prides itself on being the best place on the web for in-depth, technically-driven discussion and analysis of 3D graphics hardware. If you love pixels and transistors, you've come to the right place!

    Beyond3D is proudly published by GPU Tools Ltd.
Loading...