Damn. I had good run, time to delete account and cryNothing you ever say ever again will have any credibility.
Damn. I had good run, time to delete account and cryNothing you ever say ever again will have any credibility.
the point was that Android, some other differences aside, is a somewhat similar ecosystem to what Valve and MS want to do with their respective ecosystems.Still not sure what you mean by this. I can side-load any app I want. I can use other stores. I can copy their OS and make my own version. That's not much of an iron fist; more a soft cat-grooming-mitten.
Sure I get that. My perspective is quite different I switched worked where we used slack + zoom to teams. It not only combines best of both but also let you more easily schedule meetings. Now I work in company with few hundreds people employed, scheduling meeting is very easy as you see directly when person is busy or free propose times when everybody is free. It also maps physical conference room so you book room see what rooms are fee and so on. We have office on 4 floors with 10 meetings room on each. It’s a great asset. The other thing is during the meeting you can take control over other people pc wich traditionally we used other program for. So it has a lot of value that was my point of it being great product. Almost surprising that it came from Microsoft. So please do not crucify me for liking it.
@mr magoo last time I tried Teams it worked quite well but I didn't find it super appealing. This was almost 3 years ago though. It had some cool features though, like a forum-like approach for various things, file sharing, etc.
Games cost too much to make, the console audience isn’t growing fast enough, and skipping Steam means missing out on a massive chunk of the market. This year, I think we’ll see Xbox go completely multi-platform and PlayStation get closer and closer.
– Jason Schreier
Playstation has some exclusives, maybe not as much as Nintendo, and most the PS exclusives are usually technical showcases these days. I always reduce them to 4 or 5 blockbusters.Tbh I want to see that. I don’t want to buy ps5 just becouse there are two or three games I want to play.
"2025 might be the year where they go all-in," Toto said. "The $69 billion Activision Blizzard deal, rising costs across the board, the power of forever-titles, the huge lead of Sony, and other factors will likely leave Microsoft no choice but to bring all their big games to PS5 early, including blockbusters such as Gears of War: E-Day or Perfect Dark."
a blockbuster to me is a historic game, like say the original Mario. Nintendo had all their games on the NES, arcades, handhelds and so on, until they created Mario in 1985 and realised how good it was. Ocean asked them to license Mario and launch it on many devices but Nintendo said no. They sold 65 million NES consoles thanks to that.Amongst graphics enthusiasts yes, I don't think I saw a single 'normal' person talk about it. It's a pretty niche title like Hellblade, I'm sure its a good game and it looks well made but not exactly blockbuster tier (think generation-defining titles like RDR, Halo 3, COD4 and whatnot).
And how many people would buy an Xbox if it were announced that Elder Scrolls 6 would be released exclusively for this console? I know, they have already moved to multiplatform, but a name like TES6 would be a system seller in itself. And the truth is that MS has all the resources to launch up to 5 of these big absolute popular titles.a blockbuster to me is a historic game, like say the original Mario. Nintendo had all their games on the NES, arcades, handhelds and so on, until they created Mario in 1985 and realised how good it was. Ocean asked them to license Mario and launch it on many devices but Nintendo said no. They sold 65 million NES consoles thanks to that.
Times have changed....
How many historical games have Sony, MS and Nintendo released in recent years? None. The current blockbusters are Fortnite, FIFA, CoD...
How many people went to the shop like mad to buy an Xbox when MS acquired Activision with all that it entails exclusivities wise? And Bethesda? I can say it. None went.
The analyst has said something might happen. One can post a whole host of possibilities - that doesn't say anything about their probabilities.
Well, for one, MS committed to releasing all of its games on PC alongside Xbox like 5-6 years ago so this was probably never going to be a strategy for MS, they had already committed to this by the time they bought Bethesda.And how many people would buy an Xbox if it were announced that Elder Scrolls 6 would be released exclusively for this console?
Well, for one, MS committed to releasing all of its games on PC alongside Xbox like 5-6 years ago so this was probably never going to be a strategy for MS, they had already committed to this by the time they bought Bethesda.
Also, to answer your hypothetical: not many. Bethesda makes games like its still 2011, Starfield was widely known as 'Midfield', nobody is buying a console to play a modern Bethesda game after that. They will probably just wait for it to inevitably come to PC.
Problem is MS is always fighting the last war. You can't make a console great by buying has-been third party devs and having them become first party, you make it great by cultivating the next big thing. In the age of giant live service games they actually own one of them now, they ought to embrace the new reality and try to create something PS doesn't have instead of trying to release the best game of 2011. Or I guess just become a game publisher with a console lol.
Again this didn't happen, MS committed to simultaneous PC releases with all first party xbox games starting around the end of the Xbox One generation. The Series consoles were never going to get any exclusives, this was the design from the start.Then came the Series consoles, with which a lot of exclusive games were announced again
I'd go as far as saying that they could create a DOSBox store -many people, me included, download the entire library of MSDOS games, which are available somewhere- to play the entire MSDOS catalog on consoles -locked one and hybrid OEMS-.
They could sell the games there at a very fair price and give some money to the developers if their company still exists, if not, sell abandonware games at a very low price. Sure people could have the same for free, but lots of people don't want the hassle, if you automate the process or just let people set the most important options, like resolution of the window, etc, it could be a good option.
They could also create a PCSX2 store. Same simplicity, settings automatically optimised for each title, where Sony could get some money from each "rom", at a very reduced price, and a little fee to PCSX2 developers.
The same for MAME for arcade games, etc etc.