hmm now tell me why this MORE EXPENSIVE device has a much lower res than my ipad3 & prolly slower, so why should I buy it?
I said it before & I'll say it again, Why is MS doing kin/WP7/hotmail etc ^2
do they like losing money (pssst), balmer oh ok, passs
with the clovertrail stuff i doubt many will be trying to play modern games . Also the $800 and up of the i5/7 tablets aren't expensive for what your getting.
Sandy/Ivy Bridge are in a completely different league than Cortex A9.this MORE EXPENSIVE device has a much lower res than my ipad3 & prolly slower, so why should I buy it?
Except probably for Atom tablets.The new x86 Windows 8 tablets are going to feature Ivy Bridge instead of Sandy Bridge. Ivy Bridge has around 5% higher IPC than Sandy, and the 17W model clocks as high as 2.0 GHz and has huge 3.2 GHz turbo clock. iPad 3 still has the same old 1.0 GHz Cortex A9 that iPad 2 has (but it has more memory bandwidth). Surface (and all other x86 Win8 tablets) will outperform ARM based tablets by a wide margin.
Sandy/Ivy Bridge are in a completely different league than Cortex A9.
We did some benchmarking (10 months ago): iPad 2 (dual core Cortex A9 at 1.0 GHz) vs. Samsung Series 7 Slate Windows tablet (dual core, four thread, 1.6 GHz Sandy Bridge, 2.3 GHz turbo clock). And the results weren't pretty. The Sandy Bridge beats the iPad 2 on average by around 10x. Data structure traversal on average is "only" around 6x-8x faster on the Sandy, but for example vector maths are over 20x faster on Sandy. They are not in the same league.
The new x86 Windows 8 tablets are going to feature Ivy Bridge instead of Sandy Bridge. Ivy Bridge has around 5% higher IPC than Sandy, and the 17W model clocks as high as 2.0 GHz and has huge 3.2 GHz turbo clock. iPad 3 still has the same old 1.0 GHz Cortex A9 that iPad 2 has (but it has more memory bandwidth). Surface (and all other x86 Win8 tablets) will outperform ARM based tablets by a wide margin.
Not even a quad core 1.5 GHz Swift (or A15) in iPad 4 would noticeably reduce the performance difference, since it's going to compete against 10W Haswell. Of course Intel based tablets are slightly heavier and have slightly worse battery life, but the performance is very good. The Samsung Slate even beats my desktop Core 2 Quad Q6600 in benchmarks
Is there much more info regarding AMD based W8 tablets? I found this today regarding a Fujitsu tablet?
http://www.slashgear.com/fujitsu-gets-touchy-feely-with-windows-8-tablets-19252847/
http://www.fujitsu.com/fts/products/computing/pc/notebooks-tablets/advanced/stylistic-q572/
SSD, 4Gb RAM, dual mode finger/stylus, even has a gigabit ethernet port lol