What's the actual scale (size) of the nextgen consoles...

[Dot50Cal83]

I posted this a long time ago on the Gamespot forums, IM not sure how accurate it is but I went by the drives length. All images were resized so that the tray was 250 pixels (before resizing for the internet). http://img286.echo.cx/my.php?image=real4lv.jpg

 

[Tap In]

I posted this a long time ago on the Gamespot forums, IM not sure how accurate it is but I went by the drives length. All images were resized so that the tray was 250 pixels (before resizing for the internet).

interesting, thanks

 

[zurich]

Man, the original PS2 is still by far the sexiest of the bunch

 

[Coola]

 

[Evil_Cloud]

With a HDD inserted, it's as high as Xbox.

 

[Mikage]

http://techon.nikkeibp.co.jp/NE/rep/050617.html

From Nikkei Electronics 6/20

 

[gosh]

http://techon.nikkeibp.co.jp/NE/rep/050617.html

From Nikkei Electronics 6/20

Whats interesting about the picture is Xbox has 1.5 GFlops while Playstation 2 has 6.2 Gflops, 6 times the Gflops of Xbox ... interesting EH?

 

[Ty]

Whats interesting about the picture is Xbox has 1.5 GFlops while Playstation 2 has 6.2 Gflops, 6 times the Gflops of Xbox ... interesting EH?

What kind of math is this?

 

[Shifty Geezer]

Bad maths. 1.5x6 = 9, not 6...

 

[gosh]

Whats interesting about the picture is Xbox has 1.5 GFlops while Playstation 2 has 6.2 Gflops, 6 times the Gflops of Xbox ... interesting EH?

What kind of math is this?

Kuratagi Math

but you gotta admit its interesting in terms of gflops

 

[Tap In]

well at least now we know that apparently PS3 is slightly longer than the X360 (and taller when on end) and slightly more narrow front to back.

 

[Ty]

Whats interesting about the picture is Xbox has 1.5 GFlops while Playstation 2 has 6.2 Gflops, 6 times the Gflops of Xbox ... interesting EH?

What kind of math is this?

Kuratagi Math

but you gotta admit its interesting in terms of gflops

What kind of spelling is this?
























I kid, I kid!

If cell turns out to be a disaster than Sony is going to be in a world of hurt.

 

[DigitalSoul]

Whats interesting about the picture is Xbox has 1.5 GFlops while Playstation 2 has 6.2 Gflops, 6 times the Gflops of Xbox ... interesting EH?

Those Gflops are for the CPU alone, AFAIK.

 

[gosh]

Whats interesting about the picture is Xbox has 1.5 GFlops while Playstation 2 has 6.2 Gflops, 6 times the Gflops of Xbox ... interesting EH?

Those Gflops are for the CPU alone, AFAIK.

as is 115 for xbox 2 and 218 for cell

 

[one]

Whats interesting about the picture is Xbox has 1.5 GFlops while Playstation 2 has 6.2 Gflops, 6 times the Gflops of Xbox ... interesting EH?

Those Gflops are for the CPU alone, AFAIK.

as is 115 for xbox 2 and 218 for cell

In the system total, Xbox 1 has 400 NV Gflops

 

[gosh]

Whats interesting about the picture is Xbox has 1.5 GFlops while Playstation 2 has 6.2 Gflops, 6 times the Gflops of Xbox ... interesting EH?

Those Gflops are for the CPU alone, AFAIK.

as is 115 for xbox 2 and 218 for cell

In the system total, Xbox 1 has 400 NV Gflops

but its been theorised the Xenos is better than RSX from what we know

 

[one]

but its been theorised the Xenos is better than RSX from what we know

What are you talking about?
DigitalSoul suggests EE does geometry so its high GFLOPS rating contributes to GPU work, not CPU. OTOH, RSX does geometry so basically you can't compare EE with Cell. Hey, why not use 'Search' feature, this old topic is so recurrent.

IIRC it's not been theorized which has better performance yet. If you think it's theorized can you give me the reference that has real figures of the both GPUs?

 

[gosh]

but its been theorised the Xenos is better than RSX from what we know

What are you talking about?
DigitalSoul suggests EE does geometry so its high GFLOPS rating contributes to GPU work, not CPU. OTOH, RSX does geometry so basically you can't compare EE with Cell. Hey, why not use 'Search' feature, this old topic is so recurrent.

IIRC it's not been theorized which has better performance yet. If you think it's theorized can you give me the reference that has real figures of the both GPUs?

and also you cant compare intel 733 to 3x 3.2 ghz ppc cores

 

[one]

but its been theorised the Xenos is better than RSX from what we know

What are you talking about?
DigitalSoul suggests EE does geometry so its high GFLOPS rating contributes to GPU work, not CPU. OTOH, RSX does geometry so basically you can't compare EE with Cell. Hey, why not use 'Search' feature, this old topic is so recurrent.

IIRC it's not been theorized which has better performance yet. If you think it's theorized can you give me the reference that has real figures of the both GPUs?

and also you cant compare intel 733 to 3x 3.2 ghz ppc cores

Yes, you can! Please try to understand the gist before responding.

 

[gosh]

but its been theorised the Xenos is better than RSX from what we know

What are you talking about?
DigitalSoul suggests EE does geometry so its high GFLOPS rating contributes to GPU work, not CPU. OTOH, RSX does geometry so basically you can't compare EE with Cell. Hey, why not use 'Search' feature, this old topic is so recurrent.

IIRC it's not been theorized which has better performance yet. If you think it's theorized can you give me the reference that has real figures of the both GPUs?

The Cell is as much involved in the geometry as RSX is, same case is with Xenon and Xenos except the Xbox architecture is more flexible and enclosed compared to Cell which had to scrap Cell chip 2 which was supposed to do the GPU work and last year went for Nvidia. EE is very comparable to Cell

I Suggest you read this: http://www.realworldtech.com/page.cfm?ArticleID=RWT021005084318