That said, Wii wont be the new PS2 because today we must separate gamers into two groups, the casual (Wii) and the hardcore (PS3 and 360). PS2 also belonged to the hardcore, unlike Wii.
The PS2 was highly profitable for not only Sony but also everybody else. The Wii is primarily profitable only for Nintendo.
No it isn't..
Then who is the Wii primarily profitable for?
Why do you guys think neither MS nor Sony were rushing to cut their console prices similarly what they did with PS2 and Xbox?
Even though 480p supports 720x480p for some reason games never go above 640 horizontal res with 640x448 being used for Wii or 512x448 in the case of PS2.Possible, but the Playstation family has always been about pushing new ground on the hardware front. Though I doubt it will, the next Wii could be a generation behind the PS4 and Xbox 720 (or Xbox 3, whatever the hell). What I find absolutely hilarious is that the PS2 and it's circa 1999-2000 hardware supports resolutions up to 1280 x 1024 while the Wii is stuck with Gamecube extended hardware that is more powerful than the PS2, but fails to support resolutions above 720 x 480. Now I know that very few games on the PS2 even used the HD support, but at least it was there if a dev wanted to use it and the games that did use it: Gran Turismo 4 and Tourist Trophy, used it pretty well.
Has the wii been lead platform for any 3rd party game that has been ported to other systems?