Uncharted: Legacy of Thieves Collection [PS5, PC]
- Thread starter Unknown Soldier
- Start date
snc
Veteran
looks it runs similar as ps5 at 4k and thats like 16x less pixels ;d
Playsaves3
Newcomer
How Uncharted: Legacy of Thieves Collection’s PC launch speaks to Naughty Dog’s present and future
Naughty Dog reflects on the studio’s first PC launch, and why it’s such an important step forward for the studio.
blog.playstation.com
This game seems to be the absolute worst performer out of all sony games so far. 7000 CC users. Might also be the large size of the game, but it's really, really poor. And oh my god, i just read the user comments in that blog above. Christ almighty. Sony betrayed them and everyone should sell their playstations, his is already on ebay 
Flappy Pannus
Veteran
This game seems to be the absolute worst performer out of all sony games so far. 7000 CC users. Might also be the large size of the game, but it's really, really poor. And oh my god, i just read the user comments in that blog above. Christ almighty. Sony betrayed them and everyone should sell their playstations, his is already on ebay
Voting "Sony making their games available on other platforms is anti-consumer" as my fav so far.
D
Deleted member 11852
Guest
Accepting that my perception of the general critical thinking skills of human beings has massively nose-dived over the past few years, this is insane. But it also supports Microsoft's current argument with the UK CMA...
Too many years after the release of the game, virtually 0 marketing around this release.This game seems to be the absolute worst performer out of all sony games so far. 7000 CC users. Might also be the large size of the game, but it's really, really poor. And oh my god, i just read the user comments in that blog above. Christ almighty. Sony betrayed them and everyone should sell their playstations, his is already on ebay
Still cool to see the game running at 200 fps at 4K:
Flappy Pannus
Veteran
The scaling of this port is so odd.
Here's Uncharted 4 running at 45-60fps on a PS4 at 540p. Yes, the Lost Legacy edition has better LOD's, but very minor changes overall to the geometry. I think even taking the console optimizations into account, it's fair to assume then this game is extremely GPU limited if Jaguar cores can actually push it close to 60fps during gameplay.
Maybe this scene is particularly CPU heavy, who knows, but here's computerbase.de's testing of the market scene in Lost Legacy on a 12900K with DDR5:
6900XT, 1080p: 110fps
6900XT, 4k: 67 fps
That's only a ~65% increase from dropping to 4k to 1080p. That's what you see with a heavy CPU limited game, but a PS4 game can't maintain 120fps on a 6900Xt at 1080p? Like, how?
Here's Uncharted 4 running at 45-60fps on a PS4 at 540p. Yes, the Lost Legacy edition has better LOD's, but very minor changes overall to the geometry. I think even taking the console optimizations into account, it's fair to assume then this game is extremely GPU limited if Jaguar cores can actually push it close to 60fps during gameplay.
Maybe this scene is particularly CPU heavy, who knows, but here's computerbase.de's testing of the market scene in Lost Legacy on a 12900K with DDR5:
6900XT, 1080p: 110fps
6900XT, 4k: 67 fps
That's only a ~65% increase from dropping to 4k to 1080p. That's what you see with a heavy CPU limited game, but a PS4 game can't maintain 120fps on a 6900Xt at 1080p? Like, how?
Flappy Pannus
Veteran
And also introducing the series to a potentially new market starting with the 4th entry. I get the other games are very dated by now, but I also think a reason not to port them is that they're only viable as included with this pack, or at a heavily discounted price which Sony didn't want to do.
MS did a really poor job in communication about the changes with CPU performance counters in W11 2H22 apparently, even the xbox performance overlay is screwed wrt cpu usage atm.
Iron Galaxy + DX12 was only ever going to result in a disaster.
Flappy Pannus
Veteran
From a post on Resetera:
Jesus.
Reseta era user said:
Jesus.
Flappy Pannus
Veteran
I mean I'm not hoping much considering WB literally pulled it from storefronts so who knows who they brought in to help with Arkham Knight as the pressure was much greater then, but they did eventually get it to a pretty good state.
Maybe patches can help this going forward, but the performance scaling is so out of whack with this title though - and most reviews are "Hey, great port!", so little impetus atm. This further highlights the slowdown in competitive gen-on-gen GPU updates too, there were always poorly performing ports before, but 2 years into a console lifecycle in the past, the hardware on PC was so far ahead that sub $300 cards just dusted them. This game requires a 3080/6800XT to really outpace the PS5 (and even then maybe just matching the performance + mode with a top-end CPU) - those cards are still in the ~$1000 CAD territory for me right now.
Arkham knight never got to a good state IMO. Various aspects of the visuals still fall below the console release and a locked 60 fps might still be impossible on todays hardware.
Wouldnt use ports to gauge that, in particular not this one. A 4060/Ti or equalivent would be more accurate.
Last edited:
Flappy Pannus
Veteran
What visual aspects? Very difficult to tell as it's still 1080p on consoles so it's a flickering mess, but I don't see any rendering differences, other than the benefits the Nvidia extensions add, which can be substantial. On my 12400/3060 I will occasionally see a drop to 59fps when it's not GPU limited when driving and boosting, but that's about it.
A 1060 was giving ~80fps at 1080p with all Nvidia effects on, while the streaming issues at high framerates could still be an issue, at least the rendering prowess fell in line with the expected difference between a 1060 and the GCN GPU in the PS4. Hell I played it at 4k with a locked 30 on my 1660 before and a couple of the Nvidia effects enabled.
Here, we're looking at a 1060 needed to basically match the PS4 which is nuts.