I really don't know if that is smart or stupid from MS :?
Three different versions seem a bit too much though, two would make more sense (non HDD and PC versions)
Somehow I get the feeling Microsoft are losing focus on the console battle.
Why would they release a HDD version of xbox2? To bring backwards compatibility to those who already own xb1, making the non-HDD xb2 a console for xbox novices?
Will the HDD version have media box capabilities, and if so how limited wil they be compared to the PC xbox?
Are the mass consumers smart enough to know which version they would like to buy? If PS3 is approximately comparable to the xb2 HDD version, will the people find it more simple to go for the one simpler solution?
Will three different console versions mean even more losses in hardware for Microsoft? Will they be able to cut the manufacturing costs of three different versions?
Will all games be still compatible with the basic xb2? That would mean the HDD will only be used as a media player (/recorder).
Th xbox2 PC is not upgradable by consumer. Why would one want to buy this instead of a real (Media)PC and the basic xbox, or a real (Media) PC and PS3?
The xbox2 PC is able to play PC games too? Will it have enough PC power to run the games of that time as well as a "real" PC? Will it be able to run the top PC games of that time, or are you limited to play PC games of yesteryear?
Will the xbox2 PC have the same graphics processor, CPU and memory as the basic xbox2 to retain compatibility with console games? It will probably have XP Media Edition OS. Will it be too slow for top PC games of that time?
Will it cause the PC games development to slow down technically because they would be designed also for xbox2 (already it can be seen with PC/xbox games like the latest Deus Ex, Thief... and I do have my fears about HL2
)