digitalwanderer
Legend
I should snap a picture of a a snow covered 350Z, it looks very un-natural somehow.
Just practice a bit more often, to be able to handle dangerous situations.Sxotty said:On the topic of controllable skids I would say either an AWD car or a RWD car just pounds the daylights out of FWD as you said. I have found my WRX handles very nice in a skid though my wife does not appreciate that fact
edit:
I too want to mess around with our wrx when we get older and have money, it should be very fun to throw in the sti tranny, and some new engine in 100,000 miles.
DiGuru said:When you're starting to fly most of the time, due to your speed and the uneven surface, it's very rewarding when you think about how you avoided colliding with all the trees and stuff that were coming your way, afterwards, and all the corners you did take (without really wondering about it at that moment) with a speed about three times too great in normal circumstances, but when you have a family you might want a crash cage installed before doing stuff like that. Just in case.
Sounds like great fun to me!Sxotty said:Yeah what I loved was up in the rockies on the twisty roads with speed limits of 65 but every corner rated at 25 mph or less makes for super fun especially the dips and stuff.. Anyway yeah my wrx has the sti suspension already, and a few oter bits, but my next things on my wish list are actually a kevlar skid plate (like $450) and I do want a cage actually it would be sweet, but I don't know anyone who can weld aluminum, and I did not want a steel cage cause it is a lot heavier... ah well. I was driving it around at Moab, (which is in southern Utah btw) and some of the dirt roads there were just sweet, like fine sand 6inches deep-1 foot and you just wallow around the corners at high speed it kinda skitters and slides but it feels like a rudder of a ship almost pulls you back into the ruts kinda you know, anyway need a skid plate for more of that dont wanna bust my oil pan...
DiGuru said:Horse Power, about 0.7 KW/H. I don't know if it's the same unit in the US. But it's probably a close match.
Most cars around here have about 75 HP.
Edit: corrected, I posted it backwards.
Nope. Efficient cars rule here, horsepower is for the rich. And there really is no need to have a fast car when all the others are powered just as much as they need to be and nothing more. And the roads are build to handle any car.Sage said:you cant be serious...! surely you mean 175!?
DiGuru said:Nope. Efficient cars rule here, horsepower is for the rich. And there really is no need to have a fast car when all the others are powered just as much as they need to be and nothing more. And the roads are build to handle any car.
I know. That's why Europeans start to lauch when Americans complain about the cost of driving or gas. Or the notion of "efficient" cars that get "as much as" 25 miles per gallon and "only" have 200 HP!!! It's a bit surreal to us.Sage said:wow i consider 175hp to be an economy car... mine is just 215 (but its also a pretty small car so that helps)
DiGuru said:You will get to the maximum speed about as fast in either case, and traffic lights and stalls or other obstructions cost much more time than you can gain by going even twice as fast (some specials examples excluded), if even legally allowed.
It looks sweet, but $50k sweet I don't know about...if it even happens.Sxotty said:Digi I found the perfect car for you man, check this out here
Seriously man I bet you like it
And it meets your desire for all wheel drive as any car should now
Sage said:you cant be serious...! surely you mean 175!?
_xxx_ said:No, 75. Here as well. Remember, we pay 3-4x more for gasoline here and earn about the same after taxes and all
Sage said:then... what kind of cars do you drive!? i didnt even think you could get a car with that kind of hp unless you got like a dodge neon or pt cruiser. damned 3-cylinders!
That's fine and all, but only if you can invariably assume that just because a car is AWD or weighs more than some other car that the rubber compound will be stickier or that the brakes will be more powerful to compensate for the difference. Or are you suggesting that the same brakes and tires on a heavier car means that the difference in braking distance is marginal as opposed to a lighter vehicle?Ok got that, so there it is clear that the weight makes no difference, b/c it is directly proportional to friction.
So what do you change?
The coefficient of friction between the tire and the rubber, you can either change the road surface i.e. "it is snowing oh shit a tree" or the tire compound the rubber.
Now what else effects the braking distance?
The friction between the rotor and the pad. How do you change this?
Same answer, you can change the pad compound, but you have to balance heat with stickiness.
Ummm... damn... you'd better be getting paid up the wazoo to be thinking like that. Even though I'm also in the US and in an area where there are more Hummers than any other type of vehicle, I'm still lucky to get a 125 hp econobox people-mover (while I do admit it's anemic on power going uphill, that's still what I'd consider economy). I'd be bouncing off the wall if I could afford something that had 215 bhp.wow i consider 175hp to be an economy car... mine is just 215 (but its also a pretty small car so that helps)