... That's f*cking hysterical.
Jawed said:It's a total sham.
I wouldn't be surprised if this is a campaign to show how easily L'Inq can be mislead.
The pictures are composites: examine the edges of the dome, look at the photographic people, notice the entirely inconsistent aliasing, etc.
Jawed
Problem is, we actually have the expertise (collectively) here to make it look realDavros said:i think we should get together and come up with the official b3d inquirer prank
my reaction as well, yould think if it was someone trying to pull a fast one they'ld spend more than 2 minutes on it ( hmmmm, been reading to many beckham quotes )Jawed said:I wouldn't be surprised if this is a campaign to show how easily L'Inq can be mislead.
NVIDIA should sue them, plain and simple, that's not even bad journalism, it's just incompetence. I still don't get why Fuad writes on it.. who knows..zed said:the question remains how long afore the inquirer retracts it or even will they?
Vysez said:It took me 1 sec to see that the only difference was that one of the ugly as sin picture had a badly applied filter on only a badly selected part.
Anyone who produced this atrocity, repeatedly blessed by the mighty ugly stick, should be dragged outside and beaten to a pulp.
Anyway, from the get go it smelled like it and now it looks like it.
Or just Fuad given the way ATI is/was 'using' him.trinibwoy said:That would be too hilarious if this whole thing was one big campaign to discredit the Inq.
That is what I was implying, earlier, when I said "I wouldn't be surprised if this is a campaign to show how easily L'Inq can be mislead."trinibwoy said:OMG! Some people are speculating that even the rumoured existence of Rydermark is all part of the hoax. And who broke the original Rydermark story? - the Inquirer. That would be too hilarious if this whole thing was one big campaign to discredit the Inq.
http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=33131<snip>
Anyone who knows any kind of shader programming knows that the shader can mimic any filter from Photoshop. It is as simple as that, and I don't have any idea why should I bother to Photoshop anything or why a developer might bother to so either.
I have enough stories to write, and I don't need to make ones up. And I wouldn't benefit from the practice at all. It is as simple as that.
And I can't see why a developer would bother to do such a thing either. We are talking here about people I have known for close to five years. They never messed me up before, so I stand by my story.
</snip>