3000 names in the credits. Ever actually watched the credits at the end of a movie? Hundreds of names, very few actual cooks. They include the secretaries and accountants and Junior Best Boys from a half-dozen different studios all involved in some small capacity. 3,000 names in the credits is not the same as a studio of 3,000 developers.3000 cooks for one enormous, bland broth.
Do you not know how business works? Senior management always gets paid more. Salesmen always get paid more. The people who make the actual products always get paid less. It's economics and shouldn't surprise you unless you've just emerged from a cave!In English money, that puts management at ~£70,000 PA, and QA at ~£38,000 PA. Sorry, but there's no way that those roles are worth that money. Programmers seems about right, but not when management is paid more. Why, because they're "management?" Okay, have a crack at managing a project without a programmer who's paid well enough to shovel digital shit for hours a day
The discussion of what people get paid and why is really one for the RSPCA forum.This is an issue that I see consistently from creative industries...