Most of it extends existing instructions by adding an additional prefix to the existing instructions. There's a lot missing from AMD64 if the most modern incarnation of x86-32 is stripped out.Can an AMD64-only CPU be built without a x86 license?
Most of it extends existing instructions by adding an additional prefix to the existing instructions. There's a lot missing from AMD64 if the most modern incarnation of x86-32 is stripped out.Can an AMD64-only CPU be built without a x86 license?
On December 9, 2014, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. ("AMD") provided written notice to The New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") that AMD expects to voluntarily delist from NYSE at the close of trading on December 31, 2014 and intends to transfer the listing of its common stock to The NASDAQ Stock Market ("NASDAQ") to commence trading on the next business day, January 2, 2015. AMD's common stock has been approved for listing on NASDAQ and will continue to trade under the stock symbol "AMD."
I don't think you can conclude the drop in stock price is due to this. AMD has been dropping all week, preceding this news. The entire market has dropped as well.AMD Announces Move to Nasdaq
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/amd-announces-move-nasdaq-211500421.html
Stock is off almost 4% to $2.49 on the news
http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=AMD&ql=0
Notice of Delisting or Failure to Satisfy a Continued Listing Rule
http://biz.yahoo.com/e/141209/amd8-k.html
It means the trading aspects of the stock are handled by a different platforms: setting of prices, finding a counterparts who will buy the stock, dealing with the aftermath of a trade, settlement etc.Can someone explain what this actually means? I have no idea how the stock market works. I wasn't even aware there were different stock markets.,
On December 11, 2014, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), and AMD International Sales & Service, Ltd., a Delaware corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (together with the Company, the "Borrowers"), entered into a First Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement (the "First Amendment") by and among the Borrowers, the financial institutions party thereto as lenders (the "Lenders") and Bank of America, N.A., a national banking association, as agent for the Lenders (the "Agent"), which modifies that certain Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of November 12, 2013 (the "Loan Agreement"), by and among the Borrowers, the Lenders and the Agent.
The First Amendment amends the Loan Agreement to reduce the minimum amount of domestic cash or cash equivalents held in certain accounts of the Borrowers from $500,000,000 to $250,000,000, which the Borrowers are required to hold in order to avoid triggering certain financial covenants and other restrictive terms contained in the Loan Agreement, as well as to change certain financial and other definitions.
The First Amendment was designed to provide the Company with greater operational flexibility.
The Borrowers did not pay any amendment fees to the Lenders in connection with the First Amendment.
The preceding description of the First Amendment is qualified in its entirety by reference to the entire text of the First Amendment, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K and incorporated herein by reference.
http://biz.yahoo.com/e/141217/amd8-k.html
No, that's not what it says.AMD is running out of cash -- http://biz.yahoo.com/e/141217/amd8-k.html
No, that's not what it says.
And by the end of the last quarter, they still have $938M in cash, cash equivalents, or marketable securities, down only $10M from the quarter before.
One way this could be interpreted is that this allows them to shift more cash into marketable securities.
They expect 13% lower revenue.That third quarter is in the past. The current quarter will be a blood bath with the 20% lower revenue and the costs of the layoffs and the restructuring.
At the end of Q3, they had $298M in marketable securities and $640M in cash. They are nowhere close to running out of cash.The ONLY reason to amend the Loan Agreement from $500,000,000 to $250,000,000 is because AMD expects that very soon they will have less than $500,000,000 in domestic cash or cash equivalents.
AMD needs cash to run day-to-day operations and has no excess cash to invest in marketable securities.
For a company that is downsizing, the sale-and-lease-back operation makes financial sense. Their real estate needs are reduced, they're not in the business of being a landlord, so it's better to free up the capital that's locked into these illiquid assets, occupy as much room as needed, and have the new owner rent out the space they don't need anymore. It's not something a fast grown company would do, but it's not a sign of the apocalypse either.In fact AMD has been doing reverse mortgages the past year on property just to raise needed cash.
Yes I did and the signs are clear that AMD will report much worse numbers than what they estimated earlier.Did you do the effort to check the real numbers? I doubt it.
Tell us what those signs are then.Yes I did and the signs are clear that AMD will report much worse numbers than what they estimated earlier.
http://www.guru3d.com/news-story/tthree-senior-executives-stepping-down-at-amd.htmlJohn Byrne, General Manager of AMD's Computing and Graphics Business Group is leaving, as are Chief Marketing Officer Colette LaForce and Chief Strategy Officer Raj Naik, the company said in a press release.
Lisa Su was promoted to Chief Executive Officer in October after joining the company in 2012 as senior vice president and general manager, global business units. She will take up Byrne's duties as AMD looks for a replacement, the company said.
The changes are "part of implementing an optimal organization design and leadership team to further sharpen our execution and position AMD for growth," spokesman Drew Prairie said in an email.
The CMO 'stepping down' shouldn't surprise anyone. The past year wasn't their finest...
The fact that the loan company agreed to lower the amount of domestic cash is positive,
that sounds more like the oppositeThis is similar to your credit card company increasing your credit limit:
They allow AMD to spend their money more freely in any way they please.that sounds more like the opposite
I'm not questioning weather its good or bad I'm questioning how does lowering the cash amd has equate to increasing their credit limit
and if amd has 640M in cash like silent guy says and a debt of 500m why the hell dont they pay it off