Lets be honest. You pay a lot of money on the basic BF3 game (about 50-60 EUR), which launched with only about 6 maps. Then they expect you quite some money to pay for each map pack containing a few maps (about 15 EUR per pack). Then they expect you to pay for a Premium package to get into the front of queues (about 50 EUR, but you get the map packs you didn't buy yet for "free"). And then they launch BF4 within 2 years and start the money ripping procedure all over again.I don't understand. The game is coming out not one but TWO years after BF3. it's not being turned into CoD where you get 17 every year if you count the handheld ports and the occasional wii port.
Lets be honest. You pay a lot of money on the basic BF3 game (about 50-60 EUR), which launched with only about 6 maps. Then they expect you quite some money to pay for each map pack containing a few maps (about 15 EUR per pack). Then they expect you to pay for a Premium package to get into the front of queues (about 50 EUR, but you get the map packs you didn't buy yet for "free"). And then they launch BF4 within 2 years and start the money ripping procedure all over again.
At least Blizzard dares to tell you in your face that you need a subscription to play World of Warcraft.
So for someone that quickly got bored of Assasins Creed Brotherhood as being more of the same old same old, is there any point in buying AC Revelations?
No point whatsoever I'd wager, and I actually really, really enjoyed AC Brotherhood. For me it's been the pinnacle of the series thus far. I picked up AC Revelations a couple of months back on PSN, and I just can't get into it. It's a staggeringly boring, ill-paced and directionless mess of a game, and something about it feels completely off. The only thing keeping it from coming across as empty and cynical as your average movie tie-in are the surprisingly high production values. It's certainly a gorgeous game.
I'm liking the game play ... but I wish they had a single player campaign with a little less self determined challenge level (ie. if it had non random gear, no XP bonuses and no extra rewards for repeating a level). You still have to learn the tactics, but essentially it's a means to a cause ... a tool you use in efficient grinding.Dungeon Defenders is awesome. It was well worth the flash sale price I paid
Dont forget Bloodlines is still being actively worked on. Get the official 1.2 patch than the unofficial 8.1 patch
http://forum.dlh.net/thread.php?threadid=37032
Yeah, that is exactly true. COD every year, so 60 Euros per year.
BF every two years (?) but Premium/MapPacks after one year..
PRoblem is, all gamers are dumb sheeps accepting everything game companies throw at them...and looking at my gaming behavior and which stuff I bought and play, every year again...I am one of the dumbest sheeps around...game devs and game publisher really are lucky that their business is so forgiving, that their customers...are dumb sheeps :smile:
Is the L.A. Nwar PC port supposed to be any good?
Dont forget Bloodlines is still being actively worked on. Get the official 1.2 patch than the unofficial 8.1 patch
http://forum.dlh.net/thread.php?threadid=37032
Is the plus version the one to go?
http://pcgamingwiki.com/wiki/Vampire:_The_Masquerade_–_BloodlinesThe Basic version consists of bugfixes that do not dramatically alter Troika's vision for the game. The Plus version makes more significant changes including the reintroduction of cut content and numerous other improvements that go above and beyond what the developers may have intended.
The actual game isn't any good. Broken interrogation system, terrible shooting and driving, lifeless city with nothing to do, uninteresting characters... The main reason it sold well is because it had millions in marketing and a Rockstar logo on its box.
Dozens of professional reviewers seem to strongly disagree with you, as well as the juries that awarded the game.
And even if all its reviews were a product of media conspiracy, the user scores would reflect that, but the user score in metacritic is 7.6, which is really good too..
I just wanted to say that your opinion on the game is opposite to most of the people who played it.
DICE is making the maps and it isn't unfair for them to ask people to pay for them. At least I don't think it is. Besides I haven't bought any and I still play BF3 sometimes. It works fine.
"Professional" ones lol. They are not critics, they are just the extensions of publishers' PR departments.
Is it wrong to disagree with the masses? Or do we have to suffer the repressive tolerance?
I did not say that it is unfair.
But, why only a handful of maps with the game release?
Come on, it is about money making. Nothing wrong with that, everyone does and everyone tries to push the customer as far as he can.
But I don't have to say that I am happy with everything gaming companies do...and I do not speak about DICE particularly...just an actual example.