scooby_dooby
Legend
ya that totally sounds like Sony!
leechan25 said:It would be cool if they gave consumers a great price point in these new high tech HDTV'S, sound systems, HD movies, and PS3.
"go future without going broke!"
dubyateeeff said:There are great 720p 26" HDTVs for 1000$, that isnt too expensive. And a few more 100$ for 32" screens
xbdestroya said:Well, the console is supposedly going to be going on sale in Japan before E3, so if bubble's are going to be deflated due to price, it would have to be sooner than that.
Frankly, CES is a *much* better forum for price announcement than is E3.
I'd expect price info before in-depth tech info as far as CES and PS3 are concerned.
microsoft announced their release in japan at tgs, and launched in NA first. I dont think it matters where you announce.wco81 said:Unless they're going to release the product shortly after the event, there's no point in announcing price, date and other details. Besides which the CES is an American event and the launch is presumably going to occur in Japan first.
I dont see how this is really a legitimate reason not to tell info about the ps3.wco81 said:But the main reason they won't do it in January is that a lot of PS2s and PSPs which got purchased for Christmas could still get returned after news on the first week of January.
me too, all of those names i would love to see. maybe stick in I-8, warhawk, or Lair in that list and ill be happyNesh said:I know this is utopic but I hope they show us realtime presentations of Tekken,Heavebly Sword, Killzone and Motorstorm that are as good as the videos shown at E3
any links about the frbruary event please?BlueTsunami said:I agree with xbdestroya. CES isn't really the platform to show games (Trailers, Demos etc). If anything, it would be more hardware focused. Possible price announcment and showing certain features that the PS3 has.
Now, the Febuary event...thats a different story..
This is actually where Sony could be smart, but they're not. No other company AFAIK can offer end-to-end content and hardware. eg. Music. Sony publisher music on their own format, ATRAC. Normal mp3 players support an open standard and so a hardware manufacturer can't limit the owner to a particular service (ignoring Apple for the time being!). Sony on the other hand can provide the content and hardware, ensuring content sales. Thus they could take a hit on the hardware, like they do consoles, to secure the lucrative content sales.leechan25 said:It would be cool if they gave consumers a great price point in these new high tech HDTV'S, sound systems, HD movies, and PS3.
"go future without going broke!"
Nesh said:any links about the frbruary event please?
IGN Article in September said:With the system having missed out on its playable debut at TGS, you might be wondering when gamers will get a chance for a first hands-on test. Originally, SCE was scheduled to hold a Japanese event in February that would give players a chance to play PS3 games. Earlier, we mistakenly reported that this event had been cancelled. However, Saeki actually reveals to the magazine that SCE will be taking a somewhat different approach in holding the event. It's something that will surprise gamers, but it's being kept a secret for now.
thanksBlueTsunami said:Sure, heres a part of a IGN article that mentions the February event....
Source: http://ps3.ign.com/articles/654/654390p1.html
Heres a good reference picture to. Its a timeline of events for the PS3 (it starts in 2005)
http://ps3media.ign.com/ps3/image/a...2005-sonys-ps3-schedule-20050721020718112.jpg
Shifty Geezer said:This is actually where Sony could be smart, but they're not. No other company AFAIK can offer end-to-end content and hardware. eg. Music. Sony publisher music on their own format, ATRAC. Normal mp3 players support an open standard and so a hardware manufacturer can't limit the owner to a particular service (ignoring Apple for the time being!). Sony on the other hand can provide the content and hardware, ensuring content sales. Thus they could take a hit on the hardware, like they do consoles, to secure the lucrative content sales.
But instead we have CONNECT, which I registered to on Thursday and cancelled my registeration on Friday. I was delivered one corrupted track out of 5 purchased, with no working replacement available, over a dubiously secure network, for a format that only plays on their player, and with pretty poor compression quality too, at a higher price per track then any other service (they're the only service with the tracks I wanted). In every way they've screwed it up. Rather than have an incentive to buy into the Sony world, using Sony hardware to play Sony content, I just want to steer clear. Rather than offering cheaper hardware and cheaper content, and securing the custom, they overprice everything.
Now hopefully, for the company (though personally I don't care. I don't have shares in Sony or anything!) Stringer's trying to solve this madness. Rather than have the hardware people producing hardware without a plan to cooperate with the content people, Sony will move ahead as a cohesive force with each division contributing to the greater good of the company. That so far seems to be more what Stringer's aiming for, and a cohesive showing at CES could support this, but if anything changes I doubt it'll be for a long time. As it is, Sony's CONNECT service could provide direct purchases for PSP owners. Hear a track on the radio, boot up your PSP, hook up to CONNECT over a WiFi service and purchase. But there's no way I would buy music from CONNECT direct as it is. Likewise any amazing plans for content distribution on PS3 are going to meet nought but skepticism from me. Sony could do a whole Sony package, of TVs, recorders, consoles, music players, all at very good value to attract a Sony-wide household, and make the killing on the content that they can afford to undercut their competition on as they actually produce the content and aren't just middlemen. They could do...
leechan25 said:That's right, Sony could out right own this next generation if they properly incorporate the hardware business to support the content side of the business. We can see it in small ways will the psp. However, Sony must be willing to take a hit up front with the hardware business to allow a large mass of consumers into the incoming HD market (kinda like selling razor blades). If they do so, there really could be no company that could stop them of owning this console's lifecycles.