Sony, No 2019 E3 Showing

Discussion in 'Console Industry' started by Shortbread, Nov 15, 2018.

  1. vipa899

    Regular Newcomer

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2017
    Messages:
    738
    Likes Received:
    271
    Location:
    Sweden
    Then i dont know either if just GDDR memory lends well to pc-use?
     
  2. London-boy

    London-boy Shifty's daddy
    Legend Subscriber

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2002
    Messages:
    21,106
    Likes Received:
    4,562
    Consoles also play a whole lot of streaming services, and millions of people use them for that.

    But really the question remains, comparative to other items such as video cards (mad example but it was mentioned here), you could say the same, yet video card prices have gone up like mad.

    Phones, yes they can do a lot but what do we actually, really use them for? Internet, one call here and there, messages, social media. Does that justify them being so much more expensive, and going up every year?

    Maybe it’s just me but I’d run to the shops to get a powerful £500 console, compared to what we’d get with a 299-399 one.
     
    vipa899 likes this.
  3. iroboto

    iroboto Daft Funk
    Legend Regular Subscriber

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2014
    Messages:
    6,762
    Likes Received:
    4,975
    video cards can be used professionally or for games. It's hardware required for data science, for game development, for playing games, for doing cad or modelling work, bitcoin mining.

    I would agree, but GPUs have many more use cases in that provide ROI and not just pure entertainment.

    Phones to some people are more important than their wallet. Unfortunately its the main media conduit to the content we want.

    You could make a business case on ROI on a phone.
     
    London-boy and vipa899 like this.
  4. Magnum_Force

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2008
    Messages:
    96
    Likes Received:
    64
    Using phones as a point of comparison is probably a fools errand.

    Phones range from £100 to £1000+ now, the £100 will get you 70% of the functionality of the £1000 model. I am typing this message on a Pocopjone F1 which cost me £265 yet comes with a Snapdragon 845 and 6GB RAM, which tells you all you need to know about how much the premium phones price is down to BOM.

    A more prudent point is that most people don't pay £1000 up front for these phones, they have then on a 24 month tariff which spreads the cost.

    Maybe this is something we will see for consoles going forward, with the cost baked into PS Plus / Xbox Live subscription.
     
  5. BRiT

    BRiT (╯°□°)╯
    Moderator Legend Alpha Subscriber

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Messages:
    11,056
    Likes Received:
    6,735
    Location:
    Cleveland
    It already exists for Microsoft, it's called Xbox All Access. It's limited in where it's offered, for now. I hope to see Xbox All Access continue on for additional countries and for next-gen. It's a great deal and is what you're talking about.

    https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/store/b/xboxallaccess
     
  6. bgroovy

    Regular Newcomer

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2014
    Messages:
    468
    Likes Received:
    330
    Yeah, I don't think it's actually that unreasonable. $399 as the "norm" was an increase from two generations of $299 being the "norm" with PS1 & PS2. Two gens at 399 would mean we are due for an increase.

    Well, yeah, but PC gamers are stupid.
     
    London-boy, DSoup and goonergaz like this.
  7. Shortbread

    Shortbread Island Hopper
    Veteran

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2013
    Messages:
    3,235
    Likes Received:
    1,328
    IMHO, E3 is just a relic from a time where smartphones, tablets, internet, social media, video streaming, and other internet driven news/media outlets were in their infancy or not around. Sony missing from E3 shows of the 90s would be troubling, not so much today. I'm not saying E3 is completely irrelevant, but with todays social media and video streaming sites, and the many ways of connecting to them, E3 isn't the juggernaut it once was. Sony (Microsoft and Nintendo too) can hold their own event, have more time on what to present (quality control), have tighter control over possible leaks, offer a more direct appeal to current users, entice new consumers by having a more independent showing of their wares/IPs, and of course use social media sites, video streaming providers and other internet outlets on getting their message out broadly. In the end, not being at E3 isn't going to harm Sony or any other console manufacture that has a large social media presence.
     
    Nisaaru, milk, DSoup and 1 other person like this.
  8. Shifty Geezer

    Shifty Geezer uber-Troll!
    Moderator Legend

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2004
    Messages:
    39,354
    Likes Received:
    9,333
    Location:
    Under my bridge
    This threads goes at length into that, no? Away from E3, Sony have the spotlight. They have a big enough brand to have all the eyes of the world on them whenever they choose to announce something. E3 was about getting everyone in one place to show stuff that they otherwise couldn't see, but that's no longer the case. So Sony can schedule things to their plan, picking date, venue, time, partners, and hold it whenever they want, meaning something like Apple or Samsung, "PS5 is launching in two months, in April because goonergaz recommended it," if they really wanted.

    It's as much about not being in total control as anything. That's something Sony can do with PS as strong as it is but someone else would need to be at E3 to not be overlooked. SEGA or AMD would probably need to announce a new console at E3 rather than have their own event.

    MS probably benefit more from being at E3 as the eyes of gamers who aren't Xbox fans are looking that way so they'll get better coverage with their messages (and lots and lots of social coverage as we discuss how confused we are over what the hell they're trying to say with those messages. :p).
     
  9. Tkumpathenurpahl

    Regular Newcomer

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2016
    Messages:
    874
    Likes Received:
    608
    Remember the E3 2016 when Microsoft announced the X1X for 2017? Rumour has it that Sony were going to announce the Pro there, but Microsoft got wind and wanted to steal Sony's thunder. If there's any truth to that rumour, it's reason enough to avoid E3 for launching a console.

    Arguably, there's the loss of an opportunity to show off a bunch of its content at E3, but if Sony spend a shedload of money, somewhere in 2019, on a PS5 launch announcement, what would be the point in replicating that at E3? It would be another shedload of money just to elicit a worldwide response of "seen it."

    If the XBoxTwo launches in 2020, and the PS5 launches in 2019, Sony can afford to spend its first year delivering 4K60 versions of current generation content. So, I suppose they could sort of coast E3 2019 by signing deals with third parties to make it clear that their 4K60 game is running on a PS5.
     
    goonergaz likes this.
  10. goonergaz

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2005
    Messages:
    2,965
    Likes Received:
    652
    lol, git! :p

    (FTR I never recommended but will take credit if they do it and it's a success!)
     
Loading...

Share This Page

  • About Us

    Beyond3D has been around for over a decade and prides itself on being the best place on the web for in-depth, technically-driven discussion and analysis of 3D graphics hardware. If you love pixels and transistors, you've come to the right place!

    Beyond3D is proudly published by GPU Tools Ltd.
Loading...