Not really. I believe a ps5 wouldn't come out until 2021..PS5 "neo" in 2024/2025. There are cards in the 9-11Tflop range right now.That's some Moore's law defying fortune telling right there.
Not really. I believe a ps5 wouldn't come out until 2021..PS5 "neo" in 2024/2025. There are cards in the 9-11Tflop range right now.That's some Moore's law defying fortune telling right there.
The Scorpio could indeed sway people to pick up consoles en masse. At 4.2TFlops a PS4 Neo won't give any graphical improvements other than resolution at 4K. However, at 6-7 TFlop the Scorpio could potentially have a graphics advantage.
I think people are going to realize that the PS4 NEO offers almost nothing unless they have a 4K television. Then it will offer a higher resolution image. If they have PSVR they will get a doubling of frame rates and perhaps comptibility for PSVR 2 that will have a higher resolution display.
I propose that Sony should cancel the NEO all together and wait until they can launch the PS5 with a 10-12TFlop GPU. This will allow for 4K gaming with some graphical boost.
Once again. As nice as a supposed supersampling console would be (render at 4k, output at 720p/1080p?), the main reason it doesn't happen is capitalism. Growing number of ever advancing TVs at ever growing resolutions need to be sold. Capitalism is evil. Power to the people. Next!I would die for a console focused on upscaled 720P or 1080P. A PS5 focused on this resolution could create some awesome graphics. However, it won't happen.
Babcat wants rendering at 720p for photorealism and then upscaled to 4k.Once again. As nice as a supposed supersampling console would be (render at 4k, output at 720p/1080p?)
It's surprisingly make senseWhy's that surprising?
Yeah, the Titan X. I don't think they're are going to put the 7nm equivalent of the Titan X in a console but never say never.
It does change it for me. Mid cycle upgrades are things I never worried about before and never asked for. Now I am thinking about upgrading and I even wonder if devs will be squeezing as much as possible out of the console as they used to when the specs were fixed.And again, nothing has changed for those gamers that for whatever reason want to stick to a 6+ years cycle. Neo comes out this year, and in 3-4 years you'll still get the 'real' new generation with the PS5 or whatever.
But in the meantime you and everyone else have the option for a half-gen refresh that you can simply ignore, like many of us will, while enjoying your original PS4.
I really don't understand the hostility.
Then ignore it.It does change it for me. Mid cycle upgrades are things I never worried about before and never asked for.
they are still competing with other devs for PS4 owners' money. And the techniques used to get the most from Neo will apply to PS4. The only time PS4 will be dropped for optimisation is if the market shows gamers want Neo and PS4 software sales dive off a cliff. Until then (which isn't going to happen), PS4 will be targeted like any other console.Now I am thinking about upgrading and I even wonder if devs will be squeezing as much as possible out of the console as they used to when the specs were fixed.
8x to 10x per generation.
3x per mid-gen.
1.4x per year is a good average.
GPUs increase by 3x every 2 nodes.
We get two node jumps every 3 or 4 years.
15TF in 2020 doesn't sound that far fetched on 7nm?
Human psychology doesnt work that way.Then ignore it.
Not convincedthey are still competing with other devs for PS4 owners' money. And the techniques used to get the most from Neo will apply to PS4. The only time PS4 will be dropped for optimisation is if the market shows gamers want Neo and PS4 software sales dive off a cliff. Until then (which isn't going to happen), PS4 will be targeted like any other console.
Well then your argument is against capitalism. If Sony introducing Neo is able to get people like you who wouldn't buy a new console to buy a new console, they're job is done. If you can't resist that, you'll be doing your part for the economy.Human psychology doesnt work that way.
Many products we wouldnt care about if we didnt know they existed
Why? Explain the reasoning for devs not working hard to get the most from PS4 when it's the dominant platform.Not convinced
I guess we'll see how that ramps up as Samsung is planning to move to EUV for their "7nm" gen.15TF in 2020 doesn't sound that far fetched on 7nm?
Fabrication and investment into said infrastructure costs, complexity etc are factors here not being counted for. May not exactly hit the timelines you are proposing here. IIRC we are now hitting the harder part of fabrication.8x to 10x per generation.
3x per mid-gen.
1.4x per year is a good average.
GPUs increase by 3x every 2 nodes.
We get two node jumps every 3 or 4 years.
15TF in 2020 doesn't sound that far fetched on 7nm?
Thats a dominant but flawed impression of the economy which goes against even its own interpretation.Well then your argument is against capitalism. If Sony introducing Neo is able to get people like you who wouldn't buy a new console to buy a new console, they're job is done. If you can't resist that, you'll be doing your part for the economy.
When there is pressure and only one option, there is only one guaranteed outcome. When there is an additional option there are more outcomes.Why? Explain the reasoning for devs not working hard to get the most from PS4 when it's the dominant platform.