Ha! I paid good money for that mofo, around $700 maybe. It was freakishly expensive.You should know by now to wear gloves when these things fall off the back of a truck.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ha! I paid good money for that mofo, around $700 maybe. It was freakishly expensive.You should know by now to wear gloves when these things fall off the back of a truck.
Well, unless something has really changed, I haven't seen any circumstantial evidence of clock increases since the developer leak for Neo. From all understandings that I have so far, the wishful thinking seems to be around the fact that Neo dimensions are larger and heavier than expected; compared to what I'm unsure. Somehow this leaked information is driving the idea of higher clocks relating to more cooling. Just want to point out something who feels this way: 853Mhz is not a rounded number. Just like how 911Mhz is not either; on the contrary they're quite specific. XBO has a overly massive cooler, and they haven't moved clock speeds since launch. Yes it's true Slim moved it up, but it was for the inclusion of HDR. I think it's justified in that way.Could've been dev pressure, could be that they saw the sentiment online, pre or post Scorpio. I think it was mostly the latter, but probably a mix in the end. Apparently some first party devs wanted more memory.
Which I believe myself, and I don't think you'd get a lot of disagreement; that the comment you've written is really: Scorpio isn't a threat to Sony, but a higher clock speed is a nice to have. And I think we've discussed this a bit here and there, but if you are Sony loyal with a huge PS4 library, you aren't going to dump everything and go to Xbox because it's got more horsepower. And the idea of moving your library along is so strong of a locking mechanism it's hard to believe that Scorpio would have that big of an impact to Sony when you consider their substantial lead with PS4. So why juice up the Neo just because Scorpio is around? Likewise on this thought process I can get into why MS announced Scorpio so far in advance further below.Scorpio isn't really a threat to Sony, but 5.5TF vs 6 or 7 doesn't look as bad as 4.2 vs 6. MS still has to come in around $500 next year after all so I dont see them hitting 8TF or anything like that.
The best thing Sony could do is announce a delay in the launch of the NEO so they can use a VEGA chip.
The second best thing they can do is overclock the heck out of the GPU and CPU.
A 4.2TFlop GPU and a barely overclocked CPU with no RAM upgrade is a joke.
Although I hate it, the whole purpose of the NEO is to make 4K and VR viable. To do so and allow for any significant graphical improvement, a bigger jump is needed. Microsoft seems to understand this.
Completely disagree, Sony just need to release it.The best thing Sony could do is announce a delay in the launch of the NEO so they can use a VEGA chip.
The second best thing they can do is overclock the heck out of the GPU and CPU.
A 4.2TFlop GPU and a barely overclocked CPU with no RAM upgrade is a joke.
Although I hate it, the whole purpose of the NEO is to make 4K and VR viable. To do so and allow for any significant graphical improvement, a bigger jump is needed. Microsoft seems to understand this.
exactly, ppl still don't get system power don't win console wars, timing, marketing, exclusive price do. Ps1 & 2 were they perfect example. Xbox 1 was miles ahead of ps2 . Sony only goal is to release the box asap and price it right.Completely disagree, Sony just need to release it.
They are winning this gen quite comfortably, the Scorpio being faster isn't going to suddenly sway people to start picking up Xbox consoles en masse.
The Neo and even the Scorpio are just a stop-gap solutions, the real 4KVR console will be the PS5, of which Sony need to release in 2019; Now THAT needs to be a beast.
A 4.2TFlop GPU and a barely overclocked CPU with no RAM upgrade is a joke.
Although I hate it, the whole purpose of the NEO is to make 4K and VR viable. To do so and allow for any significant graphical improvement, a bigger jump is needed. Microsoft seems to understand this.
Fully agree.It seems a waste of resources, in addition loss of consumers who believed proposed in "five years lifetime" and with "ps4k/Neo Hype" provided ammunition for Microsoft gain market with sufficient timing to catch die powerful enough to offer any graphics level 4k (not upscaled,checkboard etc).
Completely disagree, Sony just need to release it.
They are winning this gen quite comfortably, the Scorpio being faster isn't going to suddenly sway people to start picking up Xbox consoles en masse.
The Neo and even the Scorpio are just a stop-gap solutions, the real 4KVR console will be the PS5, of which Sony need to release in 2019; Now THAT needs to be a beast.
A man throwing quotes around will be able to link to where Sony promised this.Fully agree.It seems a waste of resources, in addition loss of consumers who believed proposed in "five years lifetime" and
We've seen slides where Sony shares the amount and architecture of compute units and CPU modules in the Neo's hardware. It's a 36 compute units iGPU and 2*4-core Jaguar CPU.
The moment they shared this information was most probably when the chip was already in (or very close to) mass production stage, which means there's no way they could make any major changes since then. Unless they scraped the whole thing and are planning to launch an entirely different console in late 2017.
There is the question of what the SOC would support. The northbridge and queues the modules plug into would need to support more things hanging off of them, and generally AMD has not opted for an uncore architecture that scales well without a redesign of the interface. AMD's chips below the Bulldozer server chips don't have more things plugging into the uncore than what we have now, and what is there now is not particularly good or likely to get better if increased.
I'm not going to pretend i understand the strategy of Neo and Scorpio, they are both new devices in their respective launches, but this is my thought process behind them.
a) tap into the customer mentality that people always like the freshest and best hardware
b) by doing this you keep your customers locked into the hardware ecosystem, and continue to lock customers into services and software (where the profit is)
c) by releasing these mid generation devices, we have yet another opportunity of capturing loyalists of competing platforms. Xbox Owners that always wanted to try PS4 can now get a Neo and play with their PS4 friends and vice versa for PS4 and Scorpio.
I'll be really happy if Sony releases the Neo sooner rather than later and doesn't jump to the next generation so quickly like MS is doing. I'm typically an early adopter but expect my console to last longer than this and I'm happy enough with games improving via better programming throughout the console's life.
Why's that surprising?