We'll have a monster GPU on ps5 to play remastered ps4 games, so I don't see why not!
We'll have a monster GPU on ps5 to play remastered ps4 games, so I don't see why not!
I was thinking about a potential PS4.5 and what it would take to deliver a noticeable improvement in games. IMO, it has too be at least more than 50% raw performance.
You can look at X1 and the performance advantage that the PS4 has over it. While it exists, I'm not sure it has really shown to be that significant and noticeable outside the enthusiast. games look roughly the same and play the same (I'm sure I've fired up some console warrior with that).
So I think for the PS4.5 to make noticeable improvement and justify an upgrade, the power difference would have to be greater than the existing X1 to PS4 gap. I guess I don't see that happening on 28nm with the existing architecture. I don't think squeezing out another couple hundred MHz of the SOC will do much. A 50% increase in clocks would have to be on a smaller node and would also likely require a proportional GDDR5 BW increase. That's not feasible without GDD5x. All this sounds expensive.
I would not be totally shocked to see 2X raw performance. (which is ultimately what I think Sony would like to be able to aim for every 3 years)
I followed the PS4 instructional video on how to share my games and I never encountered that problem.If Sony is going to release a new iteration every 3 years they are going to have to loosen up their licensing model. Right now there is no point in buying a second a PS4 if you have multiple users as only the primary account can access games on the second PS4.
I was joking. No I wasn't. Yes I was.I'm skeptical there will be "remasters" on future systems. Games will run natively on all hardware iterations from here on out.
I followed the PS4 instructional video on how to share my games and I never encountered that problem.
Welcome to DRM hell.So explain to me then how my wife can play Peggle in the bedroom under her own account when the game was purchased under mine on the primary PS4 in the front room and I am logged on the primary PS4 playing something else.
This was allowed on the PS3 but then Sony decided they didn't want me to own more than one PS4.
=)
And as I've said before, this is really the most likely imperative for both manufacturers to seriously consider taking advantage of any modernised AMD hardware available that could be used to make a beefier-compatible console: Because the other guy might do it.. Welcome to the rat race of technology in pretty much every consumer field.No way Microsoft couldn't respond...
It would only impact PS4 sales for people who are interested in the new console over the base PS4 console.well this is the kind of product you can't announce months before release as it would impact badly PS4 sales. I'll buy it but i hope it does not come out in 2016.
Radeon 380X [359mm2 @28nm, 4GB GDDR5, stock clocks & 190W power drain] is rated as 3.9TF part by AMD. I could see 14nm Polaris managing to do simmilar performance in 250-280mm2 and ~100W. Perfect for a console that aims at sub-180W power drain.2X GPU, at least 3.6 TF
Radeon 380X [359mm2 @28nm, 4GB GDDR5, stock clocks & 190W power drain] is rated as 3.9TF part by AMD. I could see 14nm Polaris managing to do simmilar performance in 250-280mm2 and ~100W. Perfect for a console that aims at sub-180W power drain.
Why is everybody talking about internet rumors as if they are all officially true?
People are acting batshit crazy in that gaf thread.