randycat99
Veteran
You haven't been paying attention then. They both are more on par than you think, and competitive in different ways, as well. However, you do need to spend a chunk of money to make either into a 9 sec qtr mile car.
randycat99 said:Yes, you "think" it does. That's about it.
This is a pretty immature digression, as we will never agree on what is an appropriate analogy because we cannot even agree on what the original objects are in relation. Just pass on it.
Anyway in Europe we have the good old RGB SCART connector this leads to a pretty good image for most devices.
I guess most of you guys in the US are using the crappy S-video out. I would say don't judge the PS2 IQ when using this or the composite cable they are both very poor.
yeah funny enough, the only version of SC2 with pro-scan here in europe is the PS2 version... which is ridiculous considering the Xbox version can go up to 720p....
notAFanB said:yeah funny enough, the only version of SC2 with pro-scan here in europe is the PS2 version... which is ridiculous considering the Xbox version can go up to 720p....
isn't there a hack for this (on the evolution dashboard most likely).
I'd take the component with convenient RCA connectors any day over the pervert SCARTnotAFanB said:Anyway in Europe we have the good old RGB SCART connector this leads to a pretty good image for most devices.
it's pretty much the next best thing from Prog scan. and europe has had it for years already.
...
I'd take the component with convenient RCA connectors any day over the pervert SCART
I'd think the IQ component vs. RGB SCART is somewhat equal, I've even read that component would be a little better.
Isn't component also red-green-blue on separate leads?
Fox5 said:PC-Engine- Can an xbox really do more raw polys than ps2?
Or you can just use cheap PC with DScaller and get the same results as the best commercial deinterlacers.If you're the type of person who wants to spend ungodly amounts of money on a de-interlacer to bring interlaced output on the PS2 to progressive quality then more power to you.
Any comparision with cars is completely ridiculous, as cars are self-sufficient devices that are compelling on their own, where consoles by themselves do almost nothing, if you don't buy software for them. If you want to make a comparision with cars you would have to imagine some kind of ridiculous situation that a car that would represent Xbox would be able to run faster, but wouldn't be able to go to a number of cities where you could go with a car that represents PS2. Conversely, the car that represents PS2 wouldn't be able to go to some of the cities that 'Xbox car' can, but that number would be smaller. It's just very ridiculous coparision, reallyA Mustang and Camaro are about equal in all areas so obviously that analogy is not suitable.
PC-Engine- Can an xbox really do more raw polys than ps2?
That's pixel fillrate. Close to 4000Mp is an effective number though considering the NV2A has dedicated multi-sampling hardware.Paul said:PC-Engine- Can an xbox really do more raw polys than ps2?
It can if you take in account the BS 4000M fillrate spec given by MS(1000m * 4 because of the 4X AA) Misleading.