Not that I've seen. Will have to wait till Friday I suppose.Has any previews of the PS5 shown or talked about playing PS4 games off an external USB drive? Or do we have to wait until Friday for those details?
They can't even talk about the HDMI cable in the box!Has any previews of the PS5 shown or talked about playing PS4 games off an external USB drive? Or do we have to wait until Friday for those details?
I got to say the entire discussion has been pretty level headed and completely missing "angry" part you are describing.Some people here are becoming extremely angry and offended that other forum users are speculating about a couple dozen megabytes of cache, in a forum that is mostly dedicated to hardware discussion and speculation.
To those users I'd recommend just not participating in the conversation. You shouldn't feel offended by the discussion over what's on 30mm^2 of die area in the SoC of a gaming console.. Perhaps find better things to feel offended about, like world hunger and climate change.
Or pinneaple on pizza, jesus fuck who the hell becomes a monster that eats something like that?
I got to say the entire discussion has been pretty level headed and completely missing "angry" part you are describing.
In reality its fanboy circle jerk logic that doesn't add up to anything. People want to believe there is super secret shit hidden in commodity hardware, e.g. dual gpus and the like so they can piss on one another. I could sort of understand it in the age of one-off chips created specifically for gaming consoles but now in the age off the shelf, its down right strange.
Or pinneaple on pizza, jesus fuck who the hell becomes a monster that eats something like that?
Any discussion should start with looking at transcripts of Cerny’s presentation. The use an external USB drive for PlayStation 4 games question is answered there already as well.
We know it is, but we don't know about the boot times from external USB. That's what we're looking for. Information beyond the brief utterances in that video months ago. Hence the discussion we're trying to have.
Imagine DF will have a video once any embargo for that stuff lifts...
I guess my other rebuttal, having slept on it: Is that all cache is meant to perform this role.I only know what AMD said, it makes memory effective bandwidth wider avoiding travels to GDDR6 memory, making CUs keeping busier and getting so a better perf/watt.
I have seen many people try to call Infinity Cache as L3, but I don't think that's accurate they would have just called it L3
We all hope so, but we know everyone will be pressed for time, especially DF with all the material they have to cover. It can't release soon enough. Anyone holding off their purchasing decisions (external HDD or SSD or USB NVME adapter) or internal secondary NVME until that information is available may not be getting those items until after their console arrives.
Like I said....pre-ordering the consoles is kind of dumb....you'll have a much more complete picture of these consoles a few weeks after launch...
Are we sure L2 is still there?I guess my other rebuttal, having slept on it: Is that all cache is meant to perform this role.
Like typically, L1 is the fastest and local and private to the processor it supports
L2 is slower but larger and less local
L3 is the slowest and most global (all processing units share this memory)
so looking at RDNA
we have
L0 (CU) fastest
L1 (Shader Array) slower
L2 (All Shader engines) slowest
and now we are adding infinity cache. ?
I have seen many people try to call Infinity Cache as L3, but I don't think that's accurate they would have just called it L3.
Yeah but we're all mostly at home doing nothing and the way things are looking, we'll be very much supply constrained for weeks if not months, so better safe than sorry!Like I said....pre-ordering the consoles is kind of dumb....you'll have a much more complete picture of these consoles a few weeks after launch...
I think it has to be.Are we sure L2 is still there?
Well then if Infinity cache is above L2 (and all L2 can access the whole thing), then it should be called L3 cache.I think it has to be.
Generally speaking the higher level the cache you go, the slower it becomes but also becomes more dense.
L1 operates at 100%, L2 is 50% of the L1, and L3 is 50% of L2 or something like that.
But L3 could be massive compared to L1 in terms of storage, but in terms of silicon die space, they would be equivalent.
The fact that the IC is 1.54x the L3 tells me it's even slower than Zen 2 L3 cache, it just has to be. This would fall in line with our understanding of cache.
if IC is much slower than Zen 2 L3, you're going to be waiting a long time to retrieve results of IC. Still faster than memory of course, but you're going to be waiting significantly longer.
I think L2 needs to stay as direct memory controller stuff.
I don't know what IC does yet, or if it has a particular role, or is a generic scratch pad that just a large buffer for L2 to check before going to main memory.
why bother calling it infinity cache then? There's like 40MB of L3 on A100 cards or something like that.Well then if Infinity cache is above L2 (and all L2 can access the whole thing), then it should be called L3 cache.
Well if it’s dumb I don’t want to be clever. Enjoy fully understanding what you’re missing out on!Like I said....pre-ordering the consoles is kind of dumb....you'll have a much more complete picture of these consoles a few weeks after launch...