PC-Engine said:Of course cost is an issue what are you talking about? How many early adopters do you think there will be and for how long? Supply will be an issue to whoever cannot supply enough to satisfy demand, unfortunately it's just a lame excuse to try and rationalize why box B will be behind Box A. Box A at $300 will sell more than Box B simply because it will come out first and be priced cheaper regardless of supply. Or do you think SONY can magically supply more PS3 units than MS can supply Xbox 360 to somehow narrow the gap? It may take Box B 2 years to catch up to Box A or it may never even catch up. Since the life cycle of consoles are going to be 4 years until a new generation arrives it doesn't leave much time for catching up especially when the playing field has been pretty much flattened.
No is not.
A $99 DC could not stop a $300 PS2,that is a fact not speculation it already happen,Sony could have problems making enough consoles but MS faces the same problems,and more with the Xbox 360 which is literaly been rush to the market.
Is august and the price of the xbox 360 is not 100% official.
If true they will have and avantage by releasing first,but MS brand name seling power in the console market is not even close to the PS brand name one,Sony can catch on as soon as they get a constant flow of consoles,that could take one year.
Also the consoles life cycle will not last 4 years,that is MS that kill the xbox short by that time frame you could be buying the next xbox on 2009,which is not good at all,i do see the PS3 going as far as 2013.
I realy don't think that MS has a chance at been #1,i will change my opinion if they would perform well on Japan and Europe,but they din't is very hard for any one to win that way.
Also you say that it may never catch on,cuz of the 4 year life cycle.
Do you know how many PS2 Sony sold in 4 year,if i'm not mistaken more than 70 million consoles,compare that to MS 22 million in 4 years,and you can see how fast sony can catch and past MS in world wide sales.