Nvidia's 3000 Series RTX GPU [3090s with different memory capacity]

pjbliverpool said:
Another thing to consider with regards to RAM size is that at the start of the current generation, the fastest GPU's available were sporting only 2 and 3GB vs the consoles 8. 10GB vs the new consoles 16GB is far better.
Click to expand...

Shared pool for the consoles though, about 10 for next gen, about 2/3 for current base consoles.

Man from Atlantis said:
aida64-gpgpu_geforce-cmk6q.png
aida64-gpgpu_geforce-f7j6i.png


https://www.pcgameshardware.de/Gefo...Tests/Raytracing-Vergleich-DLSS-Test-1357418/
Click to expand...

Over 30TF for the 3080 it seems.
 
msxyz said:
Notebook variants of the 20xx GPUs are heavily throttled to make them fit for a laptop. And even at the 80W limit of the MaxQ cards, the notebook cooling solutions required already start to be heavy and noisy. The most sensible solution would be a card capable of playing games maxed out at 720p, RT included, coupled with a high performance, high quality dedicated upscaling unit. But if the upscaling process has to run on the same shader units, as it happens now with Ampere, then the upscaling performance is tied to that of the whole GPU.
Click to expand...

I know. But GA104 is more efficient than GA102 with GDDR6X. So notebooks will get 40%+ uplift with Ampere over Turing.
 
Davros said:
are they going to use eye tracking ? otherwise how do they know what part of the screen to render in high res
Click to expand...

That's how VRS is used in VR.

Outside of VR, it doesn't use eye-tracking - there's a DF video on the topic:
 
It's almost funny how slow brute compute progress is. I have 3.5year old 1080ti and 3080 is not even double the perf. I suppose this is why we need creative solutions to create better graphics. DLSS, ray trace, mesh shaders, sampler feedback etc. Just adding more of the same doesn't work anymore, or at least it works very slowly.
 
manux said:
It's almost funny how slow brute compute progress is. I have 3.5year old 1080ti and 3080 is not even double the perf. I suppose this is why we need creative solutions to create better graphics. DLSS, ray trace, mesh shaders, sampler feedback etc. Just adding more of the same doesn't work anymore, or at least it works very slowly.
Click to expand...

I think with most games at 4k the 3080 is more than 2x faster than the 1080ti. Doom Eternal is close to 2x as fast at 1080p. I have a feeling that some games at 1080p may actually be cpu limited, even with a 10900K. 10900K seems to outperform the Ryzen 3900X by a significant margin with a 3080. Makes me wonder if the 10900K is even tapping it out. Doom Eternal scales VERY well with CPU and it's closer to 4K scaling at 1080p than other games.
 
manux said:
It's almost funny how slow brute compute progress is. I have 3.5year old 1080ti and 3080 is not even double the perf. I suppose this is why we need creative solutions to create better graphics. DLSS, ray trace, mesh shaders, sampler feedback etc. Just adding more of the same doesn't work anymore, or at least it works very slowly.
Click to expand...

To be fair, all those extra features cost transistors. If a game were made to make full use of everything Ampere had to offer I'm sure it'd be much more than 2x the overall performance of a 1080Ti.

We will likely see those features used much more this generation now that consoles support (some of) them too.

Pascal was truly awesome but as it enters its 5th year I think its really about to start showing its age.
 
pjbliverpool said:
To be fair, all those extra features cost transistors. If a game were made to make full use of everything Ampere had to offer I'm sure it'd be much more than 2x the overall performance of a 1080Ti.

We will likely see those features used much more this generation now that consoles support (some of) them too.

Pascal was truly awesome but as it enters its 5th year I think its really about to start showing its age.
Click to expand...

Let's say those extra features cost something like 20% of the area. Adding 20% more compute wouldn't do much even with linear scaling. Using that 20% for ray tracing and dlss on the other hand does a lot. I really hope mesh shaders also turn out to be useful.
 
Scott_Arm said:
I think with most games at 4k the 3080 is more than 2x faster than the 1080ti. Doom Eternal is close to 2x as fast at 1080p. I have a feeling that some games at 1080p may actually be cpu limited, even with a 10900K. 10900K seems to outperform the Ryzen 3900X by a significant margin with a 3080. Makes me wonder if the 10900K is even tapping it out. Doom Eternal scales VERY well with CPU and it's closer to 4K scaling at 1080p than other games.
Click to expand...

I based my statement on this tweet posted earlier in this thread:

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1306310383809048576
 
manux said:
I based my statement on this tweet posted earlier in this thread:

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1306310383809048576
Click to expand...

Man from Atlantis said:

side by side comparison against 2080Ti
Click to expand...

So the 3080 is substatially faster then the 2080TI in rasterization, while beig 5 degress celcius cooler. Thats not thinking about RT which obvously is going to be everywhere seeing next gen consoles games (basically ALL ps5 games have it).
It's also cheaper then a 2080Ti. I think its a very good release, and bodes well for what we get from AMD.
 
 
RTX 3080 Custom Card Roundup Reviews -Part 2

Hexus ASUS TUF
MSI GAMING X TRIO
io-tech ASUS TUF
MSI GAMING X TRIO
GIGABYTE GAMING OC
JayzTwoCents EVGA XC3 Ultra
KitGuru GIGABYTE EAGLE OC
Lab501 ASUS TUF
Optimum Tech ASUS TUF
Overclock3D ASUS TUF
MSI GAMING X TRIO
GIGABYTE GAMING OC
Overclockers Club MSI GAMING X TRIO
Paul’s Hardware ASUS TUF
ZOTAC TRINITY
GIGABYTE GAMING OC
PC Games Hardware [Video] ASUS TUF
ZOTAC TRINITY
GIGABYTE GAMING OC
INNO3D iCHILL X3
PALIT GAMINGPRO OC
PurePC ASUS TUF
QuazarZone EMTEK Black Edition
SweClockers ASUS TUF
TechPowerUP ASUS TUF
MSI GAMING X TRIO
PALIT GAMING PRO OC
ZOTAC TRINITY
Techtesters ASUS TUF [Video]
Tek.no MSI GAMING X TRIO
ThinkComputers MSI GAMING X TRIO
Wccftech COLORFUL Advanced OC
XFASTEST Hong Kong INNO3D iCHILL X4
ZOTAC TRINITY
XFASTEST Taiwan ZOTAC TRINITY
GIGABYTE GAMING OC
ASUS TUF
ZOL COLORFUL VULCAN X OC
ASUS TUF
GALAX Black
GIGABYTE GAMING OC

Thanks to VideoCardz!
https://videocardz.com/newz/nvidia-geforce-rtx-3080-custom-graphics-cards-review-roundup
 
1000 CAD for 1 of these custom cards -- ahh decisions decisions. More memory isn't really going to solve things right?certainly will increase the price further I suspect.

Are people waiting for the super?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Nvidia Pulsar - variable refresh rate with backlight strobing
Replies
9
Views
879
xz321zx
X
DmitryKo
Folding@home Beyond3D_Team - Summer 2023 Call for NVidia RTX users
2 3 4
Replies
66
Views
7K
Albuquerque
Albuquerque
D
Intel Max GPU series for HPC, AI and Data Centers
Replies
3
Views
1K
trinibwoy
T
P
Paperweight GPU back in business
Replies
4
Views
565
Davros
D
J
Graphic card/CPU configuration for best memory graphics in Flight Simulator 98?
2
Replies
37
Views
4K
homerdog
homerdog
Back
Top