EDIT: This report seems to be for 2015Q3 not 2015Q4. It would be nice if JPR put a date on these reports.
Add-in board share here[URL="http://"].[/url]
EDIT: This report seems to be for 2015Q3 not 2015Q4. It would be nice if JPR put a date on these reports.
new NV headquarter finally approved and starts construction:
http://www.bizjournals.com/sanjose/...-futuristicsanta-clara-campus-is-back-on.html
Nvidia Corp. wants Qualcomm Inc. to pay up for allegedly crushing a $352 million chipset acquisition, according to details of a London lawsuit made public this week.
Nvidia claims it was forced to wind down its cellular mobile broadband chipset business, including its Icera unit just four years after buying it, as a result of Qualcomm’s "unlawful abuse of dominance," according to documents released by a London court Tuesday.
Probably because it has little "news" value excepting the attached damages amount. Icera - while still an independent company- filed the suit against Qualcomm nearly a year before Nvidia acquired the company. I think the general feeling was that between all the antitrust litigation Qualcomm was likely to be undergoing ( such as the 2009 S.Korean judgement of $208m - since added to by the Chinese antitrust judgement of $975m, the Taiwanese, second S.Korean, and EU antitrust investigations) that the market might be a more of a level playing field. No such luck. As Intel, Samsung, LG, and others have demonstrated, achieving market dominance at the expense of rivals is more than worth the value of fines and compensatory judgements levied against them.I am surprised no one has posted this yet:
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...lcomm-pay-up-after-demise-of-352-million-unit
Revenue in the three months ended on May 1st rose 13%, year over year, to $1.305 billion, yielding EPS of 46 cents, excluding some costs.
Analysts had been modeling $1.265 billion and 41 cents a share.
Nvidia’s sales from products for the video game market were $687 million, 17% higher than a year earlier. In the “professional visualization” category, sales rose 4% to $189 million.
Sales for the data center were up 63% at $143 million. Sales into autos were up 47% at $113 million. And sales into various products for original equipment makers (OEMs) declined by 21% to $173 million. The detail is contained in a PDF slide posted on the company’s IR site.
An additional document, the “CFO presentation,” provides a slice by business unit. The company’s GPU sales were up 15% from a year earlier while down 7% from Q4′s level. The “Tegra” processor line saw sales rise 10%.
They say that it's due to automotive.I'm surprised the tegra line actually increased as well, I was under the assumption shield isn't doing that great.
Possible. But typically you only book sales when the product ships, as pre-orders are a form of liability until then.I wonder whether or not the datacenter numbers already contain sales of GP100.
Having read through the seekingalpha transcript, I have to agree. Most of the commentary around GP100 is written in future tense, even with regard to the first customers.I would expect them to show on next quarter as it was too close to the end of this one for orders to be booked from a fiscal perspective (would be on their internal financial forecast reports and they would be interesting reading) , ...