Nvidia Post-Volta (Ampere?) Rumor and Speculation Thread

Discussion in 'Architecture and Products' started by Geeforcer, Nov 12, 2017.

Tags:
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. McHuj

    Veteran Subscriber

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2005
    Messages:
    1,613
    Likes Received:
    869
    Location:
    Texas
    + Quote


    If it taped out in march, it's at least 3-4 months before the silicon comes back and another ~6-12 months before product.
     
    TheAlSpark likes this.
  2. w0lfram

    Regular

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2017
    Messages:
    304
    Likes Received:
    59
    So 2020 Holiday season...? 'ish….
     
  3. Samwell

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2011
    Messages:
    149
    Likes Received:
    183
    Earlier, 1 year from Tapeout till Sale is normal. As probably the big HPC chip taped out first, add 3 months to it, so May-June for HPC Ampere.
    But the smaller chips coming after shouldn't need more than 1 year and will probably get released in a similar timeframe.
     
  4. DavidGraham

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2009
    Messages:
    3,976
    Likes Received:
    5,213
    Lightman, pharma and Ike Turner like this.
  5. TheAlSpark

    TheAlSpark Moderator
    Moderator Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 29, 2004
    Messages:
    22,146
    Likes Received:
    8,533
    Location:
    ಠ_ಠ
    "conducted"

    :wink3:
     
  6. bridgman

    Newcomer Subscriber

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2007
    Messages:
    62
    Likes Received:
    123
    Location:
    Toronto-ish
    You're thinking "semi-conducted" would have been more appropriate ?
     
    Lightman, nnunn and Alexko like this.
  7. TheAlSpark

    TheAlSpark Moderator
    Moderator Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 29, 2004
    Messages:
    22,146
    Likes Received:
    8,533
    Location:
    ಠ_ಠ
    I think it's highly appropriate for Ampere. :)
     
    Lightman and Alexko like this.
  8. Kaotik

    Kaotik Drunk Member
    Legend

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2003
    Messages:
    10,244
    Likes Received:
    4,465
    Location:
    Finland
    Just to point out that they didn't actually confirm wether all of their 7nm will come from Samsung or just some, they've used Samsung before too at least for GP107
     
  9. I think the GP108 (used in the very popular MX150) is also made on Samsung.

    In the meanwhile, I've been seeing reports saying that TSMC's vanilla 7nm have just gotten a "free" 10% performance upgrade, and that process' yields have jumped significantly.
    If 7nm DUV became so good, it makes me wonder what's the point with 7nm+ and 6nm.
     
  10. Kaotik

    Kaotik Drunk Member
    Legend

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2003
    Messages:
    10,244
    Likes Received:
    4,465
    Location:
    Finland
    Yep
    or is that "free 10 performance upgrade" really the '6nm'?
     
    Lightman likes this.
  11. It's TSMC's 2nd gen 7nm.

    I got it wrong though, it's reportedly over 5% and not 10%.

    https://fuse.wikichip.org/news/2408...ls-2nd-gen-7nm-and-the-snapdragon-855-dtco/2/



    Still the difference to 6nm will now be smaller and 7nm DUV yields are said to be really high, on the level of 16FF+.
     
    #231 Deleted member 13524, Jul 3, 2019
    Last edited by a moderator: Jul 3, 2019
    Lightman likes this.
  12. Kaotik

    Kaotik Drunk Member
    Legend

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2003
    Messages:
    10,244
    Likes Received:
    4,465
    Location:
    Finland
  13. 6nm uses a number of EUV layers.
    This 2nd gen 7nm is DUV only.
     
  14. BTW, TSMC is now claiming that 7nm is cheaper than 16nm, in cost per transistor.
    Again, this is 7nm DUV. We're not into EUV territory yet.

     
    Lightman and trinibwoy like this.
  15. trinibwoy

    trinibwoy Meh
    Legend

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2004
    Messages:
    12,058
    Likes Received:
    3,116
    Location:
    New York
    Not much of a cost improvement though. And given transistor counts are increasing much faster than density is improving there's only one direction for end consumer prices to go.
     
  16. xpea

    Regular

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2013
    Messages:
    551
    Likes Received:
    783
    Location:
    EU-China
    Very skeptical about this claim. And it doesn't take into account the huge increase in design cost and mask set
     
    A1xLLcqAgt0qc2RyMz0y likes this.
  17. del42sa

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2017
    Messages:
    208
    Likes Received:
    137
    true, but it´s Bits and Chips so take it with the same relevance as WCCFTECH :nope:
     
  18. Whoever wrote the tweet didn't author the graphs nor TSMC's claims.
     
    Alexko likes this.
  19. A1xLLcqAgt0qc2RyMz0y

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2010
    Messages:
    1,589
    Likes Received:
    1,490
    Lightman likes this.
  20. McHuj

    Veteran Subscriber

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2005
    Messages:
    1,613
    Likes Received:
    869
    Location:
    Texas
    Do we even know if Ampere is a successor to Volta or Turing? I don’t think NVIDIA has ever indicated.

    I hope it’s for consumer and not enterprise. I hope they at least double RTX performance.
     
Loading...
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

  • About Us

    Beyond3D has been around for over a decade and prides itself on being the best place on the web for in-depth, technically-driven discussion and analysis of 3D graphics hardware. If you love pixels and transistors, you've come to the right place!

    Beyond3D is proudly published by GPU Tools Ltd.
Loading...