In most 2560x1600 tests, the 680 still leads. But why don't you go look for yourself?ECH said:Why is the highest resolution 1080?
I would think that would be a resolution reserved for performance tier of cards not enthusiast.
I see .It's not the highest, it's just the one with biggest lead
The slide i am missing is the one with the system wattage in full load. Or is it there?.
Reviewers guide?So in the six games chosen by THG, a 7970 is only 10% faster than a 580 and the 7950 is slower. I think that say all about how THG have chosen the games to test with. :S
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Gigabyte/HD_7770_OC/27.htmlThe perf/w graph is somewhat weird though. Is HD7970 really just 17% better than GTX580 in perf/w?
I though its on average around 20% faster and consumes around 40W less power. So how is that 17% better is beyond me.
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Gigabyte/HD_7770_OC/27.html
Here, in 19x12, a 7970 has 53% higher perf/watt. :S
Not sure what the story with GPGU is. Performance is abysmal. Drivers?
Update 3/30/2010: After hearing word after the launch that NVIDIA has artificially capped the GTX 400 series' double precision (FP64) performance, we asked NVIDIA for confirmation. NVIDIA has confirmed it - the GTX 400 series' FP64 performance is capped at 1/8th (12.5%) of its FP32 performance, as opposed to what the hardware natively can do of 1/2 (50%) FP32. This is a market segmentation choice - Tesla of course will not be handicapped in this manner.
Why is the highest resolution 1080?
I would think that would be a resolution reserved for performance tier of cards not enthusiast.
Kepler GeForce cards are gonna be capped in DP performance just like Fermi GeForce cards. Just enough to run and debug DP code, but if you want high performance DP only Quadro and Tesla are not capped.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/2977/...tx-470-6-months-late-was-it-worth-the-wait-/6