If GK104 would be such a huge die and with a 384bit bus yes.
GK104 wants to be measured:
http://www.chiphell.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=371058&page=7#pid11248448
Direct Link to a mirror:GK104 wants to be measured:
http://www.chiphell.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=371058&page=7#pid11248448
Yes, that's about the number I arrive at, too. The die is slightly larger than twice the size of a memory chip, which measures 12x14=168mm².~356 mm² (?)
Resolution is quite limited, so error can be pretty significant.
~323,4mm²GK104 wants to be measured:
http://www.chiphell.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=371058&page=7#pid11248448
Yes, I did.fellix: Did you take perspective into account?
That by itself would enlargen the apparent die size. I would suspect the rounded edges of the connectors as the source of discrepancy. The memory chips and the die have hard edges, which makes it easier to get it right. But it doesn't solve the low resolution problem. I would put at least a 15mm² margin on every number derived from that picture, just by the +/- 1 pixel uncertainty to determine the edge of the chips. As one does it twice, it's actually even larger in the worst case.fellix: Did you take perspective into account? SLI connectors ar more distant than the GPU.
12mm x 14mm
As said above, a GDDR5 BGA170 module measures exactly 12x14=168mm².Quick photochopping tells that the die is roughly 1.33 times (or 1.53 times the height) the width of GDDR5 memory module, and roughly square, so what's the width of GDDR5 module?
As said above, a GDDR5 BGA170 module measures exactly 12x14=168mm².
Taking your (not perfectly consistent) numbers, you also arrive in the 340ish mm² ballpark.
If it's supposed to be trading blows with Tahiti, why wouldn't it be?
Because rumors say it's 256bit?