Hm, the 14th is the launch of ATIs 5670.I thought it was the 14th
A small piece of GF100 information from ChrisRay:
http://www.rage3d.com/board/showpost.php?p=1336134574&postcount=1573
and really all cards are having this problem
What is "this" problem ?
They have all one setup-engine. Means they are able of doing one triancle/clock. nVidia's problem is, that the base clock is lower than the clock of AMD cards. Cypress with 850MHz vs. (maybe GF100) 650MHz. And you need this for tessellation.
Geometry performance on Fermi is going to be extremely good.
The sticker on Fermi's fan is going to be extremely good.
somebody was disapointed, others were amazed.
I split it off to keep GF100 product speculation away from serious architecture discussion. I've just moved the stuff that hung off Chris's post to this new thread too. And if there's anything coming out tomorrow, it won't come from meI thought it was the 14th as well. As a matter of fact I thought Rys split off the architecture discussion for exactly that reason. You know, make room for the discussion of the article he's gonna post at midnight tonight.
Can you tell us why?Telling the truth, if you want to me to be more specific, cards out there now aren't going to get close to it when it comes to geometry processing.
Having a faster setup rate is nice, but it's not the be all and end all ... geometry processing is not necessarily ALU light.
Can you tell us why?
Icecold's main complaint was that the GTX280 didnt wipe the floor with his GTX8800. NoT powerfull enough for him to upgrade to I guess. So Im assumming Chris means that Fermi wont dissapoint him in this regard, but in comparison to his 8800 or to the 280 ??
I thought that supposed NV engineer said the NDA expires on the 12th? Wheres the info?
Edit: Rahja, that was his name.
Yes.So Monday is THE DAY, I heard?!