GK2xx would imply a new generation. I think this is just GK110, or possibly a respin of it.
you are right..
GK2xx would imply a new generation. I think this is just GK110, or possibly a respin of it.
Why does that worry you?what worry me is all of this look like a reaction against AMD newcomers..
Why does that worry you?
I'd be worried if they didn't react against a move of a competition.
It really makes no sense to launch a bunch of new products at the same time, especially in the professional world where budgets needs to be made months ahead of time and where you don't have to deal with entitled children who want the latest and greatest NOW.They could have launch this Atlas K40 at the same time of the K6000..
nvidia likes number 80 very much, or 8 in general. A pride number, like NV38 and NV48.
GK200, or GK210 or GK120 would imply there's an architecture or process difference, but there is not, it's either the same thing or very slightly tweaked.
Is there particularly bad scaling (as number of SMX's increase) to warrant a 10 SMX part that's boosts to 1200Mhz?
Had anyone done any analysis to show NVidia SMX and AMD CU scaling?
Or is this just a filler between 770 and 780?
by expreview forum
This might be NVIDIA's way of bringing Titan-ish performance down to ~$600 without damaging the Titan brand.
Why are the checkmarks missing from the CUDA and PhysX boxes?
According to Hardware Canucks, the 780 Ti is "the fastest graphics card they’ve ever produced." I'm not sure if they're including the Titan (or the K6000) in that comparison, but I don't see why not….