Interesting. I wonder what kind of workstation workloads require that much memory. Unless this is meant to be an all-purpose card, aimed at compute just as much as typical Quadro workloads.
Is this a new GK110 GPU spin?
NVIDIA’s other big market for Quadro K6000, like Tesla K10 and K20, is the oil and gas industry, who use GPU products both to analyze seismic data and to display it. In this case the more that can be analyzed and the more that can be displayed at once, the more useful the resulting product is
What comes to my mind is a supercomputer like loads, Earth Simulator type should benefit quite a lot, no?
I want to see a Titan Ultra with 2880 core @1.0GHz clock speed (just like GTX 680) ,I think it will not exceed 250W TDP and I am sure it will rock!http://www.anandtech.com/show/7166/nvidia-announces-quadro-k6000
Quadro K6000 is fully enabled, all 2880 cores clocked higher at 900MHz and has double the memory of TITAN yet is only 225W TDP vs 250W TDP on TITAN. Is this a new GK110 GPU spin?
Possibly/Probably given the time the GPU has been in production, although I'd note that even though the Titan is lacking in core count compared to the K6000, its TDP must be taking into account the boost function. As Anandtech noted, the Titan is boosting close to 1000Mhttp://www.anandtech.com/show/7166/nvidia-announces-quadro-k6000
Quadro K6000 is fully enabled, all 2880 cores clocked higher at 900MHz and has double the memory of TITAN yet is only 225W TDP vs 250W TDP on TITAN. Is this a new GK110 GPU spin?
No, Maximus is alive and well (I specifically asked about that). There's less of a need to use it with K6000, but you still have all the same reasons to use it with K6000 as you did the Fermi 6000: separating rendering and compute tasks to further improve performance.Ah, all-purpose it is, then. I wonder if this is a sign that NVIDIA intends to drop Maximus.
No, Maximus is alive and well (I specifically asked about that). There's less of a need to use it with K6000, but you still have all the same reasons to use it with K6000 as you did the Fermi 6000: separating rendering and compute tasks to further improve performance.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/7166/nvidia-announces-quadro-k6000
Quadro K6000 is fully enabled, all 2880 cores clocked higher at 900MHz and has double the memory of TITAN yet is only 225W TDP vs 250W TDP on TITAN. Is this a new GK110 GPU spin?
Sorry, nothing in particular. Enough Maximus systems seem to be selling via OEMs that it has to be reasonably successful, but I couldn't tell you more than that. However AMD's approach does not preclude doing the same thing; with the right software packages you can split up workloads over multiple Firepros in exactly the same manner.OK, thanks. Do you have any idea how successful it is? And how people feel about it, as opposed to AMD's relatively unified approach with FirePros?
I think that's just binning.
Plus I doubt it has a Boost function, so it can operate near Idle-voltage (0,875 Volt on Titan) - maybe 0,925 Volt. That'll save a lot of power compared to running at 1.125 Volt or so for 1006 MHz.
Sorry, nothing in particular. Enough Maximus systems seem to be selling via OEMs that it has to be reasonably successful, but I couldn't tell you more than that. However AMD's approach does not preclude doing the same thing; with the right software packages you can split up workloads over multiple Firepros in exactly the same manner.
I want to see a Titan Ultra with 2880 core @1.0GHz clock speed (just like GTX 680) ,I think it will not exceed 250W TDP and I am sure it will rock!
GK180 sku name is a bit strange... why not GK200 or 210 ? they do what they want anyway...
This was expected after the Quadro K6000.. what worry me is all of this look like a reaction against AMD newcomers.. What interest me there, is to know more about this workload boost, ANSYS; AMBER.. ( if you do 2D/ 3D modelisation since 1991, you will understand why i ask this. ).
I hate when a slide is trying to make them look better with " oppurtinity and lead over the competition "