Nvidia BigK GK110 Kepler Speculation Thread

Titan supercomputer alone already has 18,688 GK110 K20X cards, thats clearly more than 10,000.

http://nvidianews.nvidia.com/Releas...rs-Powers-World-s-No-1-Supercomputer-8b6.aspx

Tesla K20X and K20 GPU accelerators representing more than 30 petaflops of performance have already been delivered in the last 30 days.

http://venturebeat.com/2011/10/14/w...-supercomputer-will-use-graphics-chips-video/

Interestingly, gamers are making this all possible. Nvidia can afford to design and sell its $2,000 Tesla GPUs because it can bring the costs for manufacturing these chips down. It does so by selling millions of graphics chips for game machines and ordinary PCs.

Some moron claimed in previous years Fermi was not manufacturable, but that was debunked and proven well wrong that he kept quiet when GF110 shipped on launch day itself with plentiful quantities.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Some moron claimed in previous years Fermi was not manufacturable, ...GF110 shipped on launch day itself with plentiful quantities

If you are remembering Charlie for some reason, then I think it is fair to say he was right about GF100. It was a total disaster.
 
Titan supercomputer alone already has 18,688 GK110 K20X cards, thats clearly more than 10,000.
10 000 Titans != 10 000 GK110
Some moron claimed in previous years Fermi was not manufacturable, but that was debunked and proven well wrong that he kept quiet when GF110 shipped on launch day itself with plentiful quantities.
IIRC he said that about GF100, or "the big Fermi", which was true for the first iteration in the sense that they couldn't release it fully functional.
GF100b/GF110 was fixed version of the chip, better suited for the process.
 
If you are remembering Charlie for some reason, then I think it is fair to say he was right about GF100. It was a total disaster.
A total disaster in what way? The parts didn't have any dramatic flaws and sold rather well, netting nVidia a comfortable profit for mid-late 2010 and early 2011.
 

I'd say you're smart enough to be able to differentiate the desktop from the professional markets and not Tesla Kxx SKUs have nothing in common with the "Titan" SKU name. What's your point again?

Some moron claimed in previous years Fermi was not manufacturable, but that was debunked and proven well wrong that he kept quiet when GF110 shipped on launch day itself with plentiful quantities.

It's anything but absurd to think that NVIDIA might go for a limited wafer run initially for GK110 desktop, which would also explain the very high MSRP rumors. What exactly has Fermi to do with the topic at hand?
 
My point is Nvidia isn't gonna let chips just sit around and idle when they can & will sell every last GeForce GK110 GPU for revenue and profit. Not every chip will be be perfect for Tesla, defective ECC for example but perfectly fine as a GeForce GPU.
 
My point is Nvidia isn't gonna let chips just sit around and idle when they can & will sell every last GeForce GK110 GPU for revenue and profit. Not every chip will be be perfect for Tesla, defective ECC for example but perfectly fine as a GeForce GPU.

That's still not answering my hypothetical question: how sure are you that NVIDIA isn't going at least for the time being for a limited wafer run for GK110 chips? Did I miss an announcement or any rumors at least for any salvage parts with lower performance and prices than the Titan?

Profit for sure and to that quite a sizeable margin if the rumored MSRP for the Titan are for real in the end.
 
http://www.techpowerup.com/gpudb/b1417/ASUS_GTX_Titan.html

Almost 5 TFlops single precision performance if that core clock speed is true.

Wow that's just monstrous! So basically 10TF in a single box with SLI and a minor overclock.

Who'd of thought we'd be getting that so soon.

I really hope Sea Islands is something special or it's not going to look good coming out 6 months later and still being slower (even if this card will be uber expensive and uber rare).
 
Wow that's just monstrous! So basically 10TF in a single box with SLI and a minor overclock.

Who'd of thought we'd be getting that so soon.

I really hope Sea Islands is something special or it's not going to look good coming out 6 months later and still being slower (even if this card will be uber expensive and uber rare).

You know dual 6990's did that already without overclocking, right?
 
Wow that's just monstrous! So basically 10TF in a single box with SLI and a minor overclock.

Who'd of thought we'd be getting that so soon.

I really hope Sea Islands is something special or it's not going to look good coming out 6 months later and still being slower (even if this card will be uber expensive and uber rare).

Well for Tflops SP, you take 3 7970 for 1300$ and you have 12.3Tflops and 3.0 Tflops DP.. so i dont see why go for a 1800$ dual setup, specially if the rumor is true and they have cut the DP rate ( only 0,2 Tflops ) ..
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If we're talking about gaming, DP is irrelevant. SLI >>> CF, so I wouldn't even want the 7970s unless I could sell them again ;)

I was going to precise that, the card at this price is only relevant in single if you dont want go for SLI or CFX. Then you loose the benefit of use a single card. SLI and CFX i dont see the problem, I use both since the 6600-6800 series ( first SLI cards ) and x1800XTX PE ( then X1900XTX-1950XTX ). ( The same problem on both brand, the same over use of AFR lol ).

I will better like put a third 7970 bought cheap on my system ( as i have allready 2 watercooled ) instead of going to 2x Titan for 1800$.. Now im interested of taking a Titan, just for the fun of benching it. (Problem if the card is rare, here it will not sold under 1100$ ( ofc if the 900$ USD is right )
 
Last edited by a moderator:
In case of SLI vs SLI you're right. But I would much rather have 2 Titans than 3 680s. A bit better scaling, probably less power consumption and more memory.
 
You know dual 6990's did that already without overclocking, right?

Yeah but you'll get far better scaling with 2 cards and half the input latency.

I'm not a big fan of SLI/Crossfire to begin with and I'd probably never use it myself but I see it as at least a semi desirable option. Beyond 2 GPU's and it just gets pointless IMO. That's why I didn't mention 15 TFLOPS with tri-SLI.

But maybe I should just have played it safe and stuck at 5 TFLOPS for a single GPU. Less room for argument!
 
Did I miss an announcement or any rumors at least for any salvage parts with lower performance and prices than the Titan?
A Sweclockers report mentions rumors that claim additional GK110 GeForce releases later in the year, although it doesn't actually say they are lower-end compared to Titan.
 
Beyond 2 GPU's and it just gets pointless IMO. That's why I didn't mention 15 TFLOPS with tri-SLI.
It's useful for GPGPU work of course, but then again you're not exactly running the cards in SLI in that case... :)

Anyhow, it'd be really really disappointing with a 900 dollar GPU that is crippled from the outset with disabled cores and stuff. I won't buy something like that, that's for sure.
 
Hehe, you say "900 $ GPU". Do you have an estimation on the real value of this chip? Perhaps it's only 90 $. And everything else is for profit, huge salaries, and of course advertisement campaigns.
 
Back
Top