Interesting. If NVIDIA really managed to pull off >1GHz Boost (that's actually triggered in games) I'll be impressed.
You all did notice the "Titan" is different shade of green than the rest?
You all did notice the "Titan" is different shade of green than the rest?
Yea, some of the number fonts are also tampered with.You all did notice the "Titan" is different shade of green than the rest?
I noticed the "Titan" but good catch on the numbers.Yea, some of the number fonts are also tampered with.
What in the world? Heaven forbid people point out what information's fake.Off, guys, does it really matter, to put efforts to investigate on some fake images only about one week before the launch? Are you really so impatient?
What in the world? Heaven forbid people point out what information's fake.
You all did notice the "Titan" is different shade of green than the rest?
Idem, especially with the rumored 240w tdp
...and on top with a 502mm2 die area, which translates to a >14M transistors/mm2 density
Doesn't 288 GT/s with 224 TMUs imply a core clock (or at least a TMU clock) of ~1.29 GHz?
The GK110 GPU represents the heart of this card, featuring 14 SMX clusters (1 is disabled for yield reasons) for a grand total of 2,688 CUDA cores. This puts the product between two shipping products based on the GK110 core. The GTX Titan comes below the K20X with its 2,880 CUDA Cores (full 15 SMX clusters active) and above the regular K20, which ships with 13 SMX clusters enabled (2,496 CUDA cores). GTX Titan has 224 Texture Mapping (TMU) and 48 Raster Operating Units (ROP).
The chip itself is clocked at 875 MHz for reference clock, even though the two select vendors (ASUS and EVGA) have the option of custom clocking the parts. For example, ASUS GTX Titan allegedly comes clocked at impressive 915 MHz.
The company castrated the Double Precision, and you can expect great Single Precision performance (2,688 CUDA cores time 875 MHz should result in around 4.5 TFLOPS SP from a single chip). Double-precision follows the Kepler tradition of 1/24 Single Precision performance. Yes, 4.7 TFLOPS SP and 196 GFLOPS DP, nicely protecting Tesla K20/K20X and the upcoming Quadro K6000 products.
The chip commands pixel fillrate of 49 GPixel/s and texel fillrate of 196 GTexel/s (once more, Texel fillrate is identical to FP64 Double Precision), while 384-bit at six billion transfers per second was enough for amazingly high 288.4GB/s.
Doesn't 288 GT/s with 224 TMUs imply a core clock (or at least a TMU clock) of ~1.29 GHz?
That is interesting, its the first article who look like something you can trust
You do realize that Theo is practically the right hand of nVidia PR department, right? (kinda like Charlie is or at least used to be for AMD)That is interesting, its the first article who look like something you can trust