Dio said:The web is by far the worst offender here - most web sites use fonts that look terrible on TFT-with-DVI, while the system fonts in Windows are all far more readable. In contrast for gaming the TFT is superb even though it's only got 40ms response (I'm sure some quake-heads would probably be more picky).
Heh. You bet. I don't consider TFTs useful for competitive play, or even fooling around. Too frustrating. But there are other genres of games where they do just fine.
Regarding fonts, I'm afraid that I don't have much experience with the font smoothing on Windows boxen. I thought they used subpixel (manipulating RGB subpixels individually) anti aliasing techniques on LCD screens, just as Apple uses subpixel techniques on three out of the four font smoothing methods they offer (the fourth being optimized for CRTs). It seems to be functioning properly in all apps. I don't know how Windows apps handle text. They may not rely on the OS in the same way.
Exactly. To buy a "desktop replacement" you have to be sufficiently concerned to really cough up money, and make more substantial compromises. Realistically, cost has to be a huge hindrance to this trend. Even so, this is a market segment that grows very quickly, which can hardly be said for straight desktops. That says something. There is marketshare to be won in Small Form Factor if a big player decides to exploit the niche.Mostly true, although I'd argue that only very recently has the 3D performance of a desknote come up to the point where it's actually useful, plus to get a comparable system you pay twice as much - while the premium for a SFF case is less than a hundred quid (and could be much less if the volume ramps).Entropy said:Big boxy enclosures hang on for much weaker reasons. Mainly ignorance, I'd say. Most people simply don't know there are alternatives, and Dell doesn't offer them. People who care strongly enough buy desknotes instead.
(Pet peeve, why the "#¤%&&!!! do we still have to use enclosures that can accomodate 5 1/4 inch floppys? The floppy grew smaller, but the form-factor was extended to harddrives, and once the harddrives grew smaller, it was passed on to optical drives. FFS!! And it keeps getting extended to DVDs, Blue-ray and all the other computer targeted optical disk systems. Bleh.)
To be honest, while recently announced TFT panels show that manufacturers are working on the response time problem, they are not targeting 3D graphics but completely artifact free DVD playback. We'll see how far they push the development beyond that. Additionally, notebook screens have so far had slower response times than desktop panels. So one could argue that portables don't need the most powerful gfx chips, since they can't get good framerates anyway due to the display limitations. On the other hand, you definitely want to drive them at native resolutions and not lower, and as you point out, edge aliasing is particularly nasty on TFTs so high quality AA would be most useful. None of the available portable graphics chips can produce useful framerates at native resolutions with decent AA. Yet.
Getting this slightly back on the NV30 track, I have problems seeing desktop processors continue to scale ever upward in power consuption, and gfx cards along with them. It flies against the ergonomic requirements of small size, low noise and low heat generation. If this goes on, at some point going forward the market is definitely going to fork, and the bulk of office and home users will start to march to a different drummer. Shuttle and VIA are examples of niche players that are trying to gain a foothold by breaking with the current paradigm to some degree. It will be interesting to see how this pans out over the next decade.
Entropy