If we are going by anecdotal evidence: I used Xbox between 2008 and... 2008. The first one red ringed, the second one scratched the discs, the third one was fine, until I discovered that Lost Odyssey could not be played anymore due to the scratches on the disc, and I needed to pay 15 euro's to replace the disc. I said F-it, and put the 360 in a box in the attic. Every single one of my Xbox playing friends (6) eventually went through multiple consoles during the course of 2005-2009.
In comparison, of the 8 friends that played PS3 including myself, only 1 had a problem; the lens got dirty because they had a lot of dust in the house. I know this because he gave it to me after buying a new one, and opening it up and cleaning the lens fixed it.
However, my PS3's laser died in 2013; it would only play DVD's not BD media. This was after many years of use.
I know that this holds no scientific validity, but if people are really honest, and think back, the general rule is:
just look at the motherboards of both devices (first generation), the PS3 one is several generations ahead
the 360 design was filled with cheap electrolytic capacitors, while the PS3 had the advanced ones from the very beginning. Heat sink design was superior as well. No super tight board bending clamps; rather engineering elegance. Also the fan design was better, heat sink as well.
Technical engineers will find it very hard to believe that the 360 could be more reliable; looking at the crude design. Later 360 revisions were better though!
In comparison, of the 8 friends that played PS3 including myself, only 1 had a problem; the lens got dirty because they had a lot of dust in the house. I know this because he gave it to me after buying a new one, and opening it up and cleaning the lens fixed it.
However, my PS3's laser died in 2013; it would only play DVD's not BD media. This was after many years of use.
I know that this holds no scientific validity, but if people are really honest, and think back, the general rule is:
"everyone knows a person who had a PS3 die on them, but nobody knows anyone who didn't have a 360 dying"
just look at the motherboards of both devices (first generation), the PS3 one is several generations ahead
the 360 design was filled with cheap electrolytic capacitors, while the PS3 had the advanced ones from the very beginning. Heat sink design was superior as well. No super tight board bending clamps; rather engineering elegance. Also the fan design was better, heat sink as well.
Technical engineers will find it very hard to believe that the 360 could be more reliable; looking at the crude design. Later 360 revisions were better though!