People who migrate from last gen and want their GTA!!!Seriously? GTA? There's still people who don't have it?
People who migrate from last gen and want their GTA!!!Seriously? GTA? There's still people who don't have it?
Heh, I'm sure Zhuge has more sales data than you do. It really doesn't matter who 'won' last gen... it was virtually a tie. For all of the mistakes that Sony made with the PS3, their efforts to reduce the costs and the strength of the PS brand worldwide allowed them to come back from MS having a years head-start and a price advantage for the entire gen. Microsoft just doesn't have the brand power Sony does to make a comeback this gen.IHS probably had no idea what they are talking about unless somebody can prove otherwise. They are the common report people cite for PS3>360, but there's never any evidence shown behind that report. If somebody can prove the data, please do.
It might be different if IHS had said "using NPD/GFK/Media Create data, we conclude" or something, but they didn't. There's literally no mention how they concluded that. It probably was a guess IMO.
I guess we wont know but pretty much most data I know of certainly suggests X360 won by a nose (including that PS3 died off a lot quicker, due to the hot PS4)
Agreed. I can't see how people can argue that the X360 was more reliable. Not only was RRoD a HUGE issue earlier on, a lot of X360s were scratching discs.You're kidding right? You don't remember red ring of death?
There's higher reports of optical drive failure for Sony PS3, what with optics getting out of alignment and bluray laser failures. I dont know if anyone can honestly say Ps3 has higher reliability.
You should try explaining to them the truth instead of lies. The PS3 had not outsold the X360 in terms of lifetime to date sales numbers.
You're kidding right? You don't remember red ring of death?
What does that have to do with either total sales or current active users? Even if the current model failure rate of PS3 is slightly higher than 360
'Outsold' typically means more units - ran further in your analogy. You're talking about 'sold faster'.Sony outsold MS worldwide, that is a historical fact based on sale data provided by both companies.
No its not easy to believe. There's higher reports of optical drive failure for Sony PS3, what with optics getting out of alignment and bluray laser failures. I dont know if anyone can honestly say Ps3 has higher reliability.
Someone somewhere needs to present data to have a real discussion.
Someone threw out the bogus posture that there are more current PS3 users than X360 users because the PS3 system is more reliable. That claim is in dispute. That is why and how its related.
Sales data is on record, I summarised in my earlier post - it was very close and those were the last definitive figures that were published for either lastgen console.
In terms of failures, Microsoft's costs are well documented (Peter Moore on IGN's podcast later estimated the total was $150m more than the initial $1Bn underwrite) but there is nothing in Sony's financials indicating costs due to failures outside of industry norms. It's difficult to believe significant costs could be hidden given how transparent Sony's financials are regarding their gaming business.
If Sony's CFO was that good, they wouldn't have got into trouble in the first place
Most of PS3's failures came after the warranty period. Lead free solder was a problem for them as well. Outside of the warranty period the end user was charged a fee for any repairs to the device. Microsoft on the other hand footed the entire bill for any warranty repairs related to RROD as well as extending the warranty period virtually indefinitely for said issue.
In other words, no one would have been required to pay for RROD repairs once Microsoft implemented that. Hence the significant costs associated. While Sony charging users to fix issues mitigated most of the costs associated with PS3 issues.
PS3 had far higher rates of failure after the initial 1-2 year period of ownership than X360. While X360 first couple iterations had far higher rates of failure in the first year of ownership. Note - this is for the first iterations of each machine. Later in the generation both companies came to grasp with the lead free solder problem and failure rates were basically the same for both after that.
If the X360 lasted the first year without problems, it was likely to keep going. My launch X360 (used by relatives now) is still going strong. Albeit noisy. All original equipment on it as well.
Regards,
SB