DavidGraham
Veteran
IT'S official, real time hardware ray tracing in the next Xbox.
Last edited:
40x XB1X drive performance.
At face value, that's kinda unbelievable. Sony's been talking about a 20x improvement and we've debated how realistic that is, so short of a battery backed up RAM cache, how is 40x possible?
Where do they mention hardware RT?
Are they really claiming FP16 numbers to get that 4x? Seems way underhanded.From the Xbox E3 2019 briefing:
Let's Talk about our Next Console.
Reducing Load Times
Zen 2 and Navi technology from AMD
4x more powerful
GDDR6
8K Capabilities
120 FPS capabilities
Variable Refresh Rate
SSD, more than 40 times improvements
4 Generations of Content
Project Scarlett
Holiday 2020
Co-Engineered and Custom Designed with AMD
I'm positive I heard one of them say hardware ray tracing when they were bouncing between the people talking about the next Xbox.
lol, 24 tflops here we go!.Yea, glad it wasn't just me that heard 4x 1X, thought I misheard.
Hardware RT was mentioned
Hardware Accelerated RTNew Where do they mention hardware RT?
Them being relatively close tech wise was always the safe bet. It always came down to customizations and how far willing to push costs etcWow, it's like PS5 and Scarlett will basically be clones of each other. It makes me wonder what actual kind of customization there might be that you may not find in the other system. Though I'm going to assume Scarlet will likely be closer to the Navi PC implementation because of DirectX commonality.
Them being relatively close tech wise was always the safe bet. It always came down to customizations and how far willing to push costs etc
Apple used FP16 to advertise that the Mac Pro GPU reaches 56TFLOPS. I thought it was pretty scummyAre they really claiming FP16 numbers to get that 4x? Seems way underhanded.
Yes I distinctly heard it.
Didn't think of that, but would that make it 4x more powerful, even stretching truth can't see how could claim that.Are they really claiming FP16 numbers to get that 4x? Seems way underhanded
Are they really claiming FP16 numbers to get that 4x? Seems way underhanded.
Yes I distinctly heard it.
Except the only way to get a drive that fast is to shun all that and just write data directly.Maybe Microsoft knows a thing or two about device drivers, file systems, and operating systems.
It's marketing. Numbers should never be taken at face value, especially in great big advertisements like E3. Use the biggest true number you have available rather than a realistic benchmarking for a fair comparison. It's just the way it is and no-one should be surprised or irked by it. Just ensure when you get a number, you run it through appropriate reality-checks before accepting it.Apple used FP16 to advertise that the Mac Pro GPU reaches 56TFLOPS. I thought it was pretty scummy
Except the only way to get a drive that fast is to shun all that and just write data directly.
I suppose there are cases where the XB1X is extra slow due to some overhead