Hardknock said:[/QUOTE] I do not mind no-AA typ...lash makes shadows on ladys face. Very nice.
ihamoitc2005 said:I do not mind no-AA type screen but I like very high detail and even eye-lash makes shadows on ladys face. Very nice.
scooby_dooby said:that's not realtime is it? best graphics I've ever seen if it is. WOW
Laa-Yosh is right though I think, all games have some jaggies somewhere, even the GOW cut-scene that everyone drooled over and called CG had jaggies if you looked reallly really hard. This is just perfect, can't be real.
Atari sends along 4 screenshots of the characters as well as some info to go along with them. They look pretty sweet, then again it may be just from cutscenes. Click read more for the screens and character info.
Nerve-Damage said:No where on that site does it say these/those are Xbox 360 screens!?!
It actually has the game listed under multi-platform!!
Meaning these shots could have easily been taken from a high-end PC or PS3 dev-kit.
scooby_dooby said:check the homepage under latest media "XBOX 360 timeshift"
trailer takes a gigantic step down in quality though.
Nerve-Damage said:Scooby_dooby I'm not saying the trailer isnt Xbox 360 version, which by the way was posted December 15 2005. This definitely tells me these pics are from a high-end PC running at a cleaner resolution with higher AA & AF settings, especially compared too the video footage posted a month ago for the Xbox 360.
Night & Day...IMO
lol :/Atari sends along 4 screenshots of the characters as well as some info to go along with them. They look pretty sweet, then again it may be just from cutscenes. Click read more for the screens and character info.
kyleb said:Seeing as how the shots are 1600x720, I doubt they are from the 360 version. But as for the quality of AA and AF, I don't see anything outlandish about either.