NASA moon walker claims Alien cover-up

Like what?
1. Life on Earth appeared within a very short time from when the Earth cooled to the point where it was possible. This is suggestive of a high probability of abiogenesis compared to the life span of the Earth. It has been argued that anthropic reasoning may make this meaningless, but that is unknown.
2. We know that the organic molecules that make up life are produced in copious amounts in a variety of different circumstances, many of which would have been around in the early Earth.
3. Small strands of RNA can form quite naturally, and it's very, very easy for RNA to replicate in the right thermodynamic environment (consisting of repeated heating and cooling). Once you have replication, evolution takes over.
4. Lipid layers also form very readily within the right thermodynamic environment, and tend to form enclosed membranes. They also replicate naturally in the right conditions (but don't evolve without containing genetic material). These membranes are a boon for life because they concentrate the chemicals required for replication.
5. Various catalytic surfaces have been discovered that can accelerate the required chemical reactions dramatically.

Well, it seems so, although we haven't actually observed too many yet.
No, not yet. But since our observations have been very strongly limited by selection effects due to our observing instruments, and since we've found so many so close, planets are apparently the norm rather than the exception.
 
If UFOs are really advanced life forms from another planet with bitchin' space ships all I want to know is how do I hitch a ride?

Thanks for all the fish.
 
There are some special features of our solar system:
- It was formed from a super nova remnant. This is crucial to get heavier elements.
- Our sun is relatively stable. If it were more variable, that would cause problems.
- There's enough radiation to spur evolution but not so much that the planet is inhospitable.
- Bunch of other factors.

Our system is incredibly complex. That said, I do believe there is intelligent life elsewhere: The universe is incredibly large and it's seems likely that similar favorable conditions have arisen elsewhere.
 
There are some special features of our solar system:
- It was formed from a super nova remnant. This is crucial to get heavier elements..

The metallicity of the Sun (and therefore the solar system) is actually quite common. The only very low metallicity stars are very old stars.

- Our sun is relatively stable. If it were more variable, that would cause problems.
Stability is dependent on age and mass. Our Sun is almost boringly regular.

- There's enough radiation to spur evolution but not so much that the planet is inhospitable.

More important I think, our planet is just the right distance from the sun to have liquid water.

A problem with detecting sentient life elsewhere is not only linked to the probability of life elsewhere but also timing. We have had radio telescopes for some 70 years. A split second compared to the age of the universe at 13.7 billion years.

Cheers
 
I don't know why people keep saying Aliens exist because of UFO sightings and whatever. UFOs are simply time-travelling devices we will use to spend some quality time "in the good old days". :cool:
 
If you can identify some flying objects as DeLoreans they're not UFOs even though they're also from the future. Do I need to explain everything? :rolleyes:
Well, they may have traveled into the future, but they'd really all be from 1985 originally.
 
I don't know why people keep saying Aliens exist because of UFO sightings and whatever. UFOs are simply time-travelling devices we will use to spend some quality time "in the good old days". :cool:

Oh, and I forgot to add that the reason it happens infrequently and we're hesitant to contact our past selves etc, is because of Jean-Claude Van Damme, the Time Cop.
 
Moon landing was fake.

Wow, you're serious about this? Lovely. You do realize, I hope, that NASA made the radio transmissions with all of the moon missions public, so that they could coordinate management of the teams around the world? That is to say, persons completely independent of the US, such as those in Russia, could and did check the telemetry and transmissions received from the Lunar orbiters and landers. Are you really under the delusion that the USSR was conspiring with the United States at the height of the cold war?

The reality is that these hacks and cranks are simply using bogus numbers to attempt to lend credence to absolutely absurd conclusions. Even without resorting to these images, there is far more than enough data to indicate that we actually sent people to the Moon, and on multiple occasions.
 
If that was the case then why was it faked? Why stage the video/images? Just because the orbiter and landers transmitted radio transmission to earth doesn't mean people actually walked on the surface of the moon.
 
Ok that was good but what about the videos? Like the waving flag? Static electricity? What about the wire suspension anomaly?
The waving flag wasn't waving in any wind: there was a horizontal bar that held the flag extended. The flag just wasn't straight. It wasn't flapping (though there was a bit of vibration).

Why do you think that static electricity was an issue?

As for the "wires", are you talking about the video where one astronaut gets up without help of the other? Well, that's trivially explained: at the surface of the Moon, the gravity is 1/6th that of the Earth. Even with the heavy pack and suit, he was able to push himself off the ground to a standing position due to the low gravity. It's as simple as that.
 
Probably best not to argue with those who insist the moon landing was fake. In my experience, they are just ignorant pranksters trying to get a rise out of you. Nippleheads really.
 
Probably best not to argue with those who insist the moon landing was fake. In my experience, they are just ignorant pranksters trying to get a rise out of you. Nippleheads really.
What can I say? Me and brick walls...we get along.
 
The waving flag wasn't waving in any wind: there was a horizontal bar that held the flag extended. The flag just wasn't straight. It wasn't flapping (though there was a bit of vibration).

Why do you think that static electricity was an issue?

Well in the video the flag started moving from being still when one of the astronauts hops by.

As for the "wires", are you talking about the video where one astronaut gets up without help of the other? Well, that's trivially explained: at the surface of the Moon, the gravity is 1/6th that of the Earth. Even with the heavy pack and suit, he was able to push himself off the ground to a standing position due to the low gravity. It's as simple as that.

It's not that he was able to push himself up without help, it was the fact the motion looked like he swiveled from some invisible axis close to his back. If I was in a "push-up" position and pushed up really hard, I would rotate around where my feet are. That is where the fulcrum would be. Also in some of the clips you'll notice that the astronauts start to float up even before they push with their feet to hop.
__________________
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top