Interesting to read your review of the movie! If you don't mind I'd like to adress some things from the point of view of someone who really did not enjoy the movie. But before I do, I would like to add that I am not much of a fanboy for either Marvel or DC. I love superheroes independent of the company that created them. So, that's that, now here are some thoughts:
Never saw the original theatrical cut, but my mate did, and he said the movie was about 30 minutes too short, which this edition remedies. It flows great, most characters get enough screen time to breathe and distinguish themselves, and never does the movie's tempo stall and become bogged down in exposition or sentimentality or lost in irrelevant sidetracks. Excellent direction, excellent cutting. There's one sequence I would have snipped for time which is a reprisal of the same sequence earlier in the movie, but that's pretty much it.
I did see the original theatrical release, and your mate was compleatly right. The editing in that cut was horrible which had effects throughout the entire movie. Characters were underdeveloped, the plot made very little sense, and there were quite a few spacial jumps that compleatly took the viewer out of the movie. There was no flow at all.
No matter how the Extended Cut plays out and feels in comparisson, I as a moviegoer expect to see a movie that makes sense when I pay for my ticket at the cinema. Just as with any other product I buy, I expect the manufacturer to not give me half a product when I pay full price.
I'm a movie-nerd, I follow the news surrounding movies for months, even years before they are released. I knew of the behind-the-scenes bullshit that went on at WB, and I was really sad that they decided to screw their fans and customers in this way.
If this movie is "too dark", well shit. Gimme some more dark then...
Regarding the tone. Dark works for Batman, as we've seen in the past. He is a dark character, and he has some of the best and most depraved villans out there, so with that I had no issue.
Superman on the other side, well, I'm no expert here, but he is to me a symbol of hope, of American values, and looking back at my old comic books, they had a more colorful look that made the stories more upbeat.
(I know all that changed in the 90's because things had to be all dark and gritty)
Coloring in any Zach Snyder movie has been an issue of mine for years. I love the astetic look of 300, it really fits together with the source-material. But looking back at the coloring-scheme of both MoS and BvS, and everything looks so incredibly washed out and dreary. I know it is supposed to reflect the tone of the movie, and this is purely subjective, but I cannot emphazise how much I dislike that.
A third point with the tone, and this is more of a wide observation I've seen in Hollywood as a whole. But after Christopher Nolans dark and gritty deconstruction of the superhero genre in the Dark Knight Trilogy, the entirety of Hollywood seems to have had a collective brainfart, and now every other movie is trying to be the Dark Knight of [insert genre here]. I'm just so sick and tired of it. And it goes for this movie aswell.
Luthor was a cool character too. A little too over the top maybe, I don't know. Don't really understand his motivations either, other than maybe "lol, insane!", but whatever. Badguys get off easier with a murkier driving force than the hero; after all, when it all comes down to it their job is merely to be evil...
I am actually in your camp here, I know we're the minority, but I also liked Luthor. Or rather, I liked that Jesse Eisenberg tried out something new with Luthor, even if it is not 100% in character with his comic book counterpart. Maybe a little bit over the top though...
What I didn't like, and where our opinions differ, is why the badguys would 'get off easier'. He is the driving force behind the entire plot of the movie. His part was the most essensial to get right so that we as viewers could understand his motivations. But that was compleatly botched. By far my biggest complaint with the entire movie would be the mishandling of Luthors motivations and actions, it makes NO sense whatsoever.
Heck, even Batfleck was pretty great in his role.
Yes, I can't wait for the Affleck-directed solo film with Batman. He worked as both Batman and Bruce.
SFX was great, even though there's some situations with Batman obviously being too strong really for any sort of normal human being, throwing crates and grown men around like they are ragdolls. But hey - it makes for some flippin good action sequences too. And yea, he totally kills a couple guys early on in the movie too, even though no killing is supposed to be a thing which is really important to Batman. *shrug*
Just as with MoS the destruction of stuff. It just becomes exhausting to watch. And the look of Doomsday is just not good. Other than that I also liked the SFX.
Lastly, I'd give it a 4,5/10. Better luck next time.