We are at a point where even sega and nokia signed a deal for the dreamcast and the ngage, but not sony.
It will never happen, but technically the only platform where the next cod can not ship is ps5, for sony's decision.
Microsoft is no 'safer' to work for than Activision.Unless you work for Activision-Blizzard, in which case this is almost certainly an improvement in T&C of employment.
Microsoft is no 'safer' to work for than Activision.
They will get some minor concession and claim victory and that was all they wanted all along.CMA's just trying to not lose face before they cave.
Liking their job is not the same thing as determining job security. I have no doubt plenty of Activision devs greatly dislike all being piled onto make Call of Duty games, but it absolutely is a safe and well paying job to have. And Microsoft is not going to do anything to change this situation, either. The whole reason they are buying Activision is because they do make a ton of money on regular Call of Duty releases and whatnot.MS has consistently been rated one of the best companies at which to work.
<Edit> in Forbes most recent list. MS ranks 8th, Google 11th, Sony was 40th. Atvi did not crack the top 50. The list was made by surveying employees if they would recommend their workplace to others.
MS has consistently been rated one of the best companies at which to work.
<Edit> in Forbes most recent list. MS ranks 8th, Google 11th, Sony was 40th. Atvi did not crack the top 50. The list was made by surveying employees if they would recommend their workplace to others.
Were they citing another source? Because Forbes isn't really a news organization, they just let columnists write opinions.
Forbes partnered with the market research firm Statista to compile our list of America’s Best Large Employers. The ranking is based on a survey of about 45,000 workers at American companies and institutions with 5,000 or more employees. Participants were asked if they would recommend their current employers to friends and family (on a scale of 0 to 10), and to cite any other employer they would also recommend. The final list ranks the 500 large employers that received the most recommendations.
Take-Two Interactive (NASDAQ:TTWO), Electronic Arts (NASDAQ:EA), Roblox (NYSE:RBLX), and Ubisoft (OTCPK:UBSFY) could be potential takeover targets, Benchmark analyst Mike Hickey wrote in a note on Wednesday.
Potential buyers of the videogame makers include Amazon (AMZN), Tencent (OTCPK:TCEHY), Google (GOOGL), Netflix (NFLX), and Sony (SONY), according to Benchmark's Hickey.
"We believe the decision is a major victory for MSFT and should provide a path for them to complete the proposed deal," Hickey wrote. "We believe that MSFT’s successful acquisition of ATVI could provide a catalyst for further industry consolidation in the video game industry."
But why would any of that really change? They're still gonna be under the exact same management, direction and structure.No-one was talking about job security. It was the improvements in working conditions and "T&Cs of employment" that is why ABK employees will be in favour of this deal. I don't know why you thought it was about 'Job security'?
But why would any of that really change? They're still gonna be under the exact same management, direction and structure.
And the comment I originally responded to was indeed talking about job security, which is where this came from.
Kotick is not staying.Well those poor developers are in for a rude awakening when they discover that Microsoft has no plans on changing general Activision management.
They really opened pandora's box with this purchase. The market is going to be defined by the one who has the most money to buy the biggest studios.Just as I figured would happen, thanks to the MS Activision deal it will likely lead to more consolidation with regard to the game industry.
Take-Two, Electronic Arts, Roblox, Ubisoft could be targets after Activision deal
Well those poor developers are in for a rude awakening when they discover that Microsoft has no plans on changing general Activision management or generally getting into any more detailed management of the company.
I'd be exceedingly surprised if MS allows the behavior that was tolerated at ABK to continue under MS ownership. Anyone that remains and has a history of harassment and abuse of employees will likely either be let go or retained under probation with continued employment contingent on good behavior.
You don't get a reputation as a good workplace by current and former employees if you have a consistently toxic environment. To be clear, all companies have cases of harassment and abuse, it's how prevalent it is, how tolerated (or even encouraged) it is and how the company's HR responds to complaints that forms the basis of employee satisfaction.
And it's undeniable that people working for MS are far more likely to be happy with their employment environment and conditions than what existed at ABK or even the vast majority of tech companies period.
Regards,
SB