Amazon's Luna and Nvidia's GFN uses Windows virtual machines and if Microsoft acquired means to produce content, the other cloud gaming providers would likely face intimidation when it comes to licensing ...I'm confused. What windows have anything to do with cloud gaming?
I hope it stops. But I fear MS might use the billions in cash to acquire a larger number of smaller in comparison yet very important large studios, bypassing thus the scrutiny that huge acquisitions go through to be green lidNote: I guess this means that the "acquisition race" is officially coming to an end for now ...
Not counting Japanese game publishers for other reasons but the only other possible viable options left for Microsoft are Ubisoft, Embracer Group, or buying off the gaming divisions/rights of either Warner Bros. Discovery or Disney ...I hope it stops. But I fear MS might use the billions in cash to acquire a larger number of smaller in comparison yet very important large studios, bypassing thus the scrutiny that huge acquisitions go through to be green lid
There's effectively no one stopping them from doing so ...If they can't acquire, will they instead work out exclusivity contracts?
wait till they parted out I guess.I’m just curious what happens to Activision if these deal doesn’t go through. They were seeking a buyout, presumably for reasons and not just for lols. If they fell into financial ruin would they be allowed to sell, or would the IP still be considered too critical for a Microsoft or Sony to purchase?
There's not any reason other than the shareholders wanting to cash out. If Activision couldn't make a profit anymore then the value proposition of their IPs goes down dramatically as well with other potential buyers so I assume that their sale would go unopposed by regulators ...I’m just curious what happens to Activision if these deal doesn’t go through. They were seeking a buyout, presumably for reasons and not just for lols. If they fell into financial ruin would they be allowed to sell, or would the IP still be considered too critical for a Microsoft or Sony to purchase?
For 70 bilion they can buy Take2, Ubisoft, Electronic Arts and Cd Project...Not counting Japanese game publishers for other reasons but the only other possible viable options left for Microsoft are Ubisoft, Embracer Group, or buying off the gaming divisions/rights of either Warner Bros. Discovery or Disney ...
There's effectively no one stopping them from doing so ...
they can't.For 70 bilion they can buy Take2, Ubisoft, Electronic Arts and Cd Project...
I mean theoreticalythey can't.
Part of the issue of the ruling is that CMA is basically saying that MS is now an unstoppable force in the cloud market. Thus they can freely block MS as soon as 'cloud' is mentioned, for any of their products really, not just games.
It's a big issue for MS going forward, they're going to have to fight it, or at this point in time, every other company will leverage regulators to ensure that new markets like cloud never gain enough traction to take hold.
There's not any reason other than the shareholders wanting to cash out. If Activision couldn't make a profit anymore then the value proposition of their IPs goes down dramatically as well with other potential buyers so I assume that their sale would go unopposed by regulators ...
Growth is going to be harder from now on and the tech sector in general is over inflated in terms of value. Shareholders can still very much make profit for sometime via dividends but they think they can make more by selling their shares. There's really not much to it when shareholders voted to approve the transaction ...But why do the shareholders want to cash out? Why did Activision approach Microsoft for a buyout? If Activision is doing great and has the biggest games, wouldn't they want to continue their success? Usually shareholders only want to sell if growth stops and they predict a trend in the other direction.
I don't know how Phil thinks about it now (yes, there are some 2nd party games coming, don't know if MS owns the IP), they used to reject a lot of things because they wanted to own the IP no matter if it was 1st or 2nd party.If they can't acquire, will they instead work out exclusivity contracts?
Take Two and Electronic Arts are probably not options for the same reason as Activision. Microsoft can try to test the boundaries with regulators as much as possible with other smaller publishers but I don't think they'll let Microsoft buy out all of the smaller publishers since they only get more hawkish with every acquisition ...For 70 bilion they can buy Take2, Ubisoft, Electronic Arts and Cd Project...
wow. didn't expect that
“When you talk about Nintendo and Sony, we have a ton of respect for them, but we see Amazon and Google as the main competitors going forward,” he said. “That’s not to disrespect Nintendo and Sony, but the traditional gaming companies are somewhat out of position. I guess they could try to re-create Azure, but we’ve invested tens of billions of dollars in cloud over the years.”