Mark Rein says the 360 controller works(if it ain't broke, don't fix it). I say it works but it aint perfect. It's not perfect because the thumbsticks don't give you as much control as they could. Why? because they are small.
Why do FPS play better with a mouse? If a controller was perfect, it's thumbsticks should give you as much control as a mouse or more, but they don't. So how do you make a standard controller better?
Putting the mouse in the living room doesn't work because it's hard to use a mouse on your lap. You could take that extreamly small thumbstick and make it a foot long, turning it into a hand stick, and allow for much more control. By extending the radius from the rotational pivot point of the thumbstick, you create more control.
or, you could do what nintendo did.
Nintendo came up with a cool fix. They put the entire thumbstick in your hand and added x,y,z motion. So, even if you forget about the x,y,z motion thing for a moment, the rev remote should give you more contol when compared to a small thumbstick.
The rev remote is really just the right thumbstick on steroids. Any game that involves aiming or the usage of the right thumbstick should work fine or better.
I'm not sure if i'm making any sense but i don't think the rev is all about tennis and golf games. it's more about improving the analogue sticks by adding more analogue.
I'm one of the many who tend to use the thumbsticks as if they are digital, because of my herky jerky motions. either the stick is rotated to the max or in the neutral position. This problem exists because of smallness of the sticks.
OK, nevermind.
)